Deviant chamber wall
Welcome!
editHi Deviant chamber wall! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! --94.197.97.137 (talk) 15:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. --Deviant chamber wall (talk) 15:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- No problem. 94.197.97.137 (talk) 15:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
editHello, I'm Victor Schmidt. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Papier-mâché that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. "go find a hobby muppet" isnt exactly WP:CIVIL. Most editors here consider Wikipedia to be (one of) their hobbies. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deviant chamber wall, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Deviant chamber wall! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC) |
Apology and resolution
editHi, DCW. I just want to say I’m terribly sorry for the way I’ve treated you earlier. I fully understand the dispute I got ourselves into, I feel very guilty about it, so I’d like to calmly resolve it... I think the sentence you’ve tried to modify in Papier-mâché still needs a citation because I think the terms ‘not long’ and ‘shortly’ do not change how the sentence is said. The way the sentence was said indicated whoever typed it wasn’t sure of its statement, so it needs a citation. I didn’t know if you were trying to insert a reference in good-faith, but ClueBot and I misconceived it as vandalism, so ClueBot’s removal of your edit might have been a false positive, meaning it was a wrongful revert. I’ve decided to remove my warnings and keep your talk page the way you want it, but I’ve seen that you’ve made an uncivil comment against me in one of your edit summaries, so the caution Victor gave you is going to stand. I hope this clears this dispute. StormContent 21:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)