Dicka
editeed new den-womens' fa cup final reference not relevant to article
only if you're a pc obsessed wally-I disagree.
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Wikipedia. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bob talk 15:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, actually, I should have been more specific - the above comment was in reference to Trinity Centre Multi-Storey Car Park. Also, don't forget to sign your contributions on talk pages by typing four tildes like: (~~~~). Thanks. Bob talk 15:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Sure, that's fine then, but it would be more helpful if you left a small edit summary of the changes you have just made to articles (it's the box just above the save button) otherwise it can just look like random deletion. Thanks. Bob talk 09:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Anna Paquin
editTo add a source, just add <ref>Place your text (reference) here</ref> or read this page for a template that you can just copy & paste and fill in the blank. :) Pinkadelica (talk) 09:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Future projects of Anna Paquin
editFirst, imdb is not a reliable source. Rumours that actors and directors are going to do something are not enough to add them to an article. Second, even if you were going to list imdb as a source it doesn't list The Irene Sendler Story. Third although the Irene Sendler story is reffed in the article it won't air until April next year at the earliest, and so this is when it would be best to add it to the article, not six months before hand. And finally, you are near 3RR, reverted to, 1RR, 2RR. Darrenhusted (talk) 14:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Gypsy Girl (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not appear to be notable, nothing to support its inclusion found in a BEFORE
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Gypsy Girl (TV series) for deletion
edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gypsy Girl (TV series) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.