Dijares

November 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ratt. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 17:24, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ratt shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Mlpearc (open channel) 17:25, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

RATT

@Mlpearc: I have no idea why you're sending me this. You are referring to the RATT article. The changes I made were reverted by USER:Sabbatino, and he and I discussed this. He and I came to a consensus and it was decided I could revert the changes back, and then edit it to be similar to Jack Russell's Great White, as their situations are similar. After Sabbatino and I came to this decision, you replied "Good luck". I made the reversion, and was in the process of making the changes to make the information like Jack Russell's Great White, when you reverted the changes back, and then sent these to me. I did not abuse my editing privileges. I discussed the situation on the talk page with the other editor, and we came to a consensus. Now you have tied my hands and have forced me to take this to a higher level, which I did not want to do. I consider you doing the reverting after the consensus was made as an abuse. You did not discuss this, nor did you give any input on the consensus, so what you did was an abuse.

Let me rephrase my comment Well, I'm moving on, good luck with your consensus I meant, I have no wish to discuss this the Ratt issue, hope consensus goes your way. (You still have no consensus for your POV campaign) Please do not ping me any further, and concentrate on getting the consensus you seek. Happy editing, - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:25, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

May 2017

Hello, I'm Chrissymad. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Joshua Alan. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)