April 2011

edit
 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kent Hovind. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 13:08, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Kent Hovind

edit

You might want to add your comments to the relevant thread at the bottom of the talk page, so that people can find them. Thanks, Catfish Jim & the soapdish 13:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, unfortunately you continued to revert following the edit warring notice given above. You may be given a cooling-off block. Please read WP:3RR for the relevant policy. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 14:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit war

edit

Hi,

I have not reverted to any more editing. The page has since been blocked since I last sent you the previous e-mail, so I have not edited anything anymore. To say that I have is not factual. I respected your last e-mail and you need but to see the time of my last edit for proof. The original POV sentence is still on the page. I have taken my argument to the talk section and have also requested a POV tag to be added to the article as per your suggestion. Dimestore (talk) 14:19, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

With all due respect, your most recent revert to the article was made twenty minutes after I placed the Edit warring notice on this page. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 14:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

You may want to make your case here Catfish Jim & the soapdish 14:54, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply