Dinesh.lama.rumba.333999

June 2023

Hello Dinesh, I have reverted the edits you've made so far. Wikipedia is not the place to glorify your caste, clan, region, country or whatever. Wikipedia is not for publicising novel evidence, theory or conclusions. We try to cover, in a neutral manner, what's already been established by reliable sources. Even then, information has to be relevant to the particular article. What you are doing is spamming. Please stop that. If you would like to become a contributor to Wikipedia and need further advice, I can help. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 04:46, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

your misunderstaning my changes. the only reason why i added the clan also of the thakuri dynasti rulers of nepal and ansuverma founder of this dynasty was so that reader will also see the origin of them. not to glorify any clan etc.

i'm beeing doing research on nepal, and my ancestors from years my freind. now as i'v found all this strong data, i wanted to use wikipedia as plateform to let readers also know the origin of them, as nepali history books are silent on origin of ansuverman and his dynastys origin.

Thank you Dinesh.lama.rumba.333999 (talk) 17:07, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

That's not what Wikipedia is for. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Wikipedia does not provide platform to right things you might think have been wronged. Wikipedia summarises information available in reliable reputable sources. If the sources considered reliable and reputable happen to wrong or incomplete, Wikipedia will rather have wrong or incomplete information than include unsourced original research. Usedtobecool ☎️ 17:19, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

I am challenging your additions by removing them. To get them included, please go to the article talk page and make a case for why the text should be included. Please do not readd it before you garner consensus on the talk page per Wikipedia editing guidelines. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 17:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Usedtobecool ☎️ 17:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

ur not getting wt i'm saying. i see u'r book sheep who only follows already estabilished belife system. considering solid reliable evidence the remains of dew sing found in nuwakot in the reliable source, don't u think? its different thing, nepali history remain silent on this information. regarding the reliabe source, if that is wt u want i have plenty of reliable source.

1. remain of dew sing palace
2. baru dont represents any caste/surname in nepals history
3. dew sing is hindu name and as its evident he was ruler, he was thakuri. note thakur is only class, which any ruler of nepal can have considerig they are ruler and under hindu system
4. the local ethinc people statement which they heared from their grand fathers is also one of the reliable source, they don't need to tell lie to their grand children
5. its nepali authorities/government officials themselvs who have stood that stone inscription so it is reliabe source of dew sing as last hindu ruler of nuwakot kingdom
6. kantipur did sent their army in nuwakot battle but from the both information we can conclude that kantipur amry and dew sing both fought that battle its simple common sense
7. why don't u go to nuwakot, remains of dew sing palace and do reserch u'r self.

i'v read lots of wikipedia info and found unreliable data on them if u are talking about relaiblity of data in wikipedia. this data is far reliabe than them. dont' change. or remove my contrys history from this international online information website. its not my personal research. i'v only acted as person who has brohgt reliable soruces only here.not acting from personal point of view Dinesh.lama.rumba.333999 (talk) 17:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

No, none of those are acceptable as sources. You need to cite a document published by a reliable source saying exactly what you are claiming on the Wikipedia article. If there is a document published by a journalist, historian or even a government department, we would start to get somewhere. Usedtobecool ☎️ 19:15, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

The stone incription i have attahced as referece itself is stood by the chief of nepal armed police force, Mr. Ganesh thada magar and president of nuwakot, kakani, ward no. 01. This is the official action done by Nepali authority in the rememberance of dew sing the final ruler of nuwakot.

Its not practical to publish a research paper on history. As the action was taken by nepals government officials as u can also see/witness no one can deny its reliability. Dinesh.lama.rumba.333999 (talk) 19:46, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Regarding document published by reliable source we can accept the stone incription which clearly shows existence of dew sing as real. NOTE: It is government officils themselvs who have built that.

Its not practical to publish document for each and every history which are found with time. Maybe they have published document as the stone incription they has stood their is real. Dinesh.lama.rumba.333999 (talk) 19:50, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Governments do things in service of more than facts and truths. So, no, government saying something is not necessarily reliable. The local governments are especially unreliable. They have no expertise. Not only do they not have the competence to establish history, they don't have the competence to know that they don't have the competence for it. If an official history or archaeology department of the federal government makes those claims, I would start to take it seriously. If then, it gets covered by national newspapers, we could include the events surrounding the whole exercise somewhere on Wikipedia. But to actually take it as factual history, we would need historians to write about it. Even then, if it's a random historian, we would need them to get that published in peer-reviewed academic journals. If it's a renowned historian, it maybe acceptable wherever they may publish it. And still, even when historians write about it, we would have to say "this or that historian says here that such and such is the case". We would still not, in Wikipedia's voice, just claim that it is true. Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thakuri dynasty, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. My Pants Metal (talk) 19:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

is the stone incriptino stood by Mr. Ganesh tadha magar, chief of nepal armed police formce and Mr. Man bahadur lama, president of nuwakot, kakani ward no 1 UNRELIABLE?

If yes. i will not. But i need your statement that it is not reliable with u'r reason. Dinesh.lama.rumba.333999 (talk) 20:33, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

A stone inscription is not a reliable source. Please read WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:OR. If you're going to make major contributions to Wikipedia, you're going to have to understand those policies. Otherwise, it's not going to work out. My Pants Metal (talk) 21:09, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

If it is reliable, than i requst wikipedia to not remove the contnet which is useful for people of nepal and world to know the history of nepal. As till now origin of thakury dynasty, who they were, where they came from is unknown to general public. If the purpose of wikipeida is to provide knowledge. Dinesh.lama.rumba.333999 (talk) 20:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Thakuri dynasty. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 20:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

i only asked u to give u'r reason why u think the source i provided is not reliable beofre changing it. u didn't and chaged the content. u'll be punished for this one day, who ever u r, i promish this to god Dinesh.lama.rumba.333999 (talk) 03:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Final warning

You have been using various IPs, and possibly accounts, to insert your ramblings into articles such as Thakuri, Thakuri dynasty and Khasa Kingdom. You need to stop. If you continue to do so without regard for Wikipedia policies, guidelines and etiquette, I will be forced to report you to administrators. You can not win this by edit-warring and socking. If all else fails, the articles can simply locked from being edited by all but the most experienced editors. I urge you, before you make more edits on these topics, to carefully go through Wikipedia policies and guidelines. They include, content-wise, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NOR and behaviour-wise, WP:EW, WP:SOCK and WP:DR. Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:18, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

were my referneces false? were my reasons false? all this dynasties are us. my full name is "dinesh lama aringal rumba" lama is my religious heridatory title. aringal is my royal heridatory title. rumba is my family name. rolamba. we are called thari lama (original lama) of tamang communtiy (bhotias). just cas of u'r GUESS and HYPOTHESIS that cas i have rumba surname i must be doing it to promote my name u Guessed wrong hypothesis and took a solid action in royal action. Dinesh.lama.rumba.333999 (talk) 15:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 16:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)