October 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to List of wars involving Bangladesh, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of wars involving Bangladesh, you may be blocked from editing. Ekdalian (talk) 10:58, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Ekdalian I have sources of battles Dipankar sraigan798 (talk) 16:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please cite reliable and verifiable sources while modifying or adding content! Ekdalian (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Ekdalian , @Materialscientist, The user is continuing to do the same. The user continues to revert the edits, even going as far as reverting the removal of the move tag. I removed certain rows from the tables after verifying their authenticity and assessing the reliability of the sources, as they fall under the guidelines of WP:RAJ. But he is consistently reintroducing those rows without providing a clear explanation. Please take an action on this. Ajayraj890 (talk) 11:04, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of wars involving Bangladesh. Ekdalian (talk) 07:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raid On Ganges (October 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Klinetalk to me!contribs 16:41, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Dipankar sraigan798! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Klinetalk to me!contribs 16:41, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raid on Ganges (October 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 17:11, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Numberguy6 I have proofs Dipankar sraigan798 (talk) 17:12, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raid on Ganges (October 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:12, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raid on Ganges (October 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:21, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

  Hello Dipankar sraigan798! Your additions to Draft:Raid on Ganges have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. SamX [talk · contribs] 17:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring

edit
 

Your recent editing history at List of wars involving Bangladesh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
So please don't make any changes till the discussion is over Ajayraj890 (talk) 17:59, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Raid on Ganges

edit

  Hello, Dipankar sraigan798. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Raid on Ganges, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Raid On Ganges

edit
 

Hello, Dipankar sraigan798. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Raid On Ganges".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 23:51, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply