Dishari98

This is Dishari98's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stan culture (July 14)

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There may be something viable here, but it needs significantly cutting down so it is only paraphrasing/summarising reliable sources in a neutral way.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stan culture and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 11:24, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Dishari98! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 11:24, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stan culture (July 24)

Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Stan Twitter instead.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Stan Twitter. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stan culture and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:18, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have added a section in the existing Stan Twitter page on Wikipedia under the Culture Section (Evolution and Creative Output) as per your suggestion. Dishari98 (talk) 09:37, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Courtesy ping @Robert McClenon Qcne (talk) 12:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edits on Stan Twitter article

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! Thanks for your edits on the Stan Twitter article. I think they obviously had a lot of thought and effort put into them, and I like to assume those edits were made in good faith. I removed a lot of them because I think the content you're adding is broad in its scope and discusses general fandom concepts, as opposed to concepts related to the more specific/particular scope apt for Stan Twitter. I think a lot of the things you added can be better served and would fit better over at Fandom, or once your Stan culture draft gets approved, those concepts would definitely fit on there. Soulbust (talk) 18:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic