Two things

edit

I'm suspecting that you don't know that deleting material from your user talk page, while permitted, is generally considered bad form: it looks like you are trying to hide something. I looked through the history, and I can see you are not, but its not generally good Wiki etiquette.

So, what I came here about in the first place: on what basis do you say that Image:Gasworks.jpg is the work of the Federal government? You don't clearly cite where you got it from (which you should), but you say it was on seattle.gov, which is a city site, not a federal site. If it's city, it's probably copyrighted and we can't keep it. If it's federal, we need a clean indication of where it's from so we know it's OK. - Jmabel | Talk 20:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply


  • Thanks for the tips. And feel free to delete the image; I obviously mistagged it. Fair Use is such a nebulous, if, at points, arbitrary debate outside a courtroom. I won't bother pursuing it here. Cheers. — Dishwasherrat 23:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Cut and paste moves

edit

Please do not move pages by cutting and pasting the content. It separates the edit history from the content, which is a requirement of GFDL. If you think a page needs to be renamed and you are not able to move it correctly yourself, then propose it on Wikipedia:Requested moves. olderwiser 02:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Use the Move button at the top of the page. See Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page for more details. olderwiser 11:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • Oh, right. I believe I made that mistake initially when I had some difficulty with the Move function and then corrected it consulting that particular WP page. Thanks again for your kind assistance. — Dishwasherrat 16:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

WP:LEAD & WP:ARCHIVE & Minor edits

edit

Hello. Please do not delete ==headers==, and see the guide at WP:LEAD, especially the part about "appropriate length" and the future "Wikipedia 1.0". Thanks. -- 62.147.112.246 16:42, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

P.S. You can also see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page in order to avoid an appearance of impropriety about deleting your talk page. -- 62.147.112.246 16:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

P.P.S. - Any addition or deletion of material, even a single word, is "not a minor edit" on Wikipedia. It is made worse when they aren't explained or justifed with an edit summary. Please have a look at:

-- 62.147.112.246 20:00, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Regina Spektor

edit

You're sure she didn't use the red piano before 2005? Also, does she still use it? I'm not sure she was using it on the last Conan O'Brien appearance a month or so ago. Badagnani 23:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I can always ask on the "Respekt" discussion board -- those people know everything about her! And if they don't know, Regina appears to participate on the board as well, so she'd be able to say exactly. Badagnani 23:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Signatures

edit

[copied]
Hi there. I'm hoping you can help me out. I notice a lot of editors sign their Talk comments with varying "signatures" of sorts; as in yours, "Jmabel | Talk", with respective emboldening, superscripting/subscripting, parentheses, etc. Is this something that has to be manually formatted for each post or is there some way to designate the four tildes to show a pre-written format; perhaps a Signature preference or similar? Thanks in advance for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dishwasherrat (talkcontribs) 20 August 2006 [end copied]

For starters, you get a basic sig by just typing ~~~~. But, yes, signature is on the preferences page. I don't know what skin you are using, so I can't tell you visual navigation to get there, but you can access that at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences. - Jmabel | Talk 04:00, 21 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Asaurusrecords.jpg)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Asaurusrecords.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:The Weepies—Live Session EP cover.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The Weepies—Live Session EP cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Kalakala.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Kalakala.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:DebTalan.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:DebTalan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Live Session (The Weepies EP) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Live Session (The Weepies EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live Session (The Weepies EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Status (talk · contribs) 12:58, 12 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply