DivineTogether

Your submission at Articles for creation: Padma Rao Sundarji (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Padma Rao Sundarji and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Padma Rao Sundarji, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:58, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, DivineTogether! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:58, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Padma Rao Sundarji (August 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Hatchens was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Hatchens (talk) 18:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Padma Rao Sundarji has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Padma Rao Sundarji. Thanks! Hatchens (talk) 18:27, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

New message from ToBeFree

Hello, DivineTogether. You have new messages at ToBeFree's talk page.
Message added 21:01, 30 August 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:01, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

problems with the page

Normally it's not a good idea to move pages oneself, but I see from ToBeFree's talk page it was just a misunderstanding.

Nonetheless I would not have yet accepted the article. I agree she's possibly notable , but the article is missing basic information (the dates she was in her various jobs--we normally give them in chronological order) , and when I attempted to fill them in from the sources I could not, because you did not give links. It's accepted practice here if here's a specific online link to the reference , to give it . If the reference is only in print, we normally give the page number, but i would expect everything here to be online.

Since the references seem to deal with some controversy (I could get at least this information because I can read a little German, and there was a link to the German article ) and this is a biography of a living person, it's essential to give this information.

There's another question. Since this is your only contribution, and since it is writtenas a biography praising the subject and giving only her side of a controversy, , it is reasonable to ask whether you are a connected contributor, in which case you must declare the connection. Please see our rules on Conflict of Interest If you are writing this for pay or as a staff member of her organization, see also WP:PAID for the necessary disclosures. If it's just that you know about her, just say so. This is not at all an accusation, merely a question. DGG ( talk ) 18:05, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks DGG, of course I'd like to see an answer to these concerns as well. In Special:Diff/1041455114, DivineTogether wrote "I am not connected either"; that was enough for me at that point of time. It does seem reasonable to ask why DivineTogether chose to write about this specific person. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:12, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

in my experience , coi is especially likely when the contributor is unwilling to change an article when requested, especially when it's a bio. DGG ( talk ) 21:40, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

DGG, are you sure that's what has happened here? I thought the main voiced concern was about notability. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:57, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

promotionalism and borderline notbility tend to go together. I usually pay more attention to the promotional aspects. DGG ( talk ) 23:21, 1 September 2021 (UTC) `

Nomination of Padma Rao Sundarji for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Padma Rao Sundarji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padma Rao Sundarji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 20:42, 19 September 2021 (UTC)