Djstates

License tagging for Image:Djstates.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Djstates.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Notability

Yes, I did add the tag. I also added a note on the article's talk page, explaining why I added it. The main problem with the article as it stood when I added the tag was that the article did not cite any puhished sources independent from the article subject that discussed Mr. States. Whenever notability is questioned on Wikipedia, the main thing is to CITE SOURCES. I assume by your username that you are the Mr. States in question. If so, as a university professor you really should be famiiliar with the concept of citing sources and should make your students do it in papers they write. ~ ONUnicorn (Talk / Contribs) 04:34, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

You mentioned the article on CHARMM. See near the bottom of the page where it has a section called "References" that tells where the authors of that article got their information? That's what the article on David States needs. That's what will prove notability, if other people are talking about him, then there can be no question that he is notable. The links you added in the external links section are all well and good... but they don't prove notability. You seem to think that the mere fact that he is a professor at University of Michigan means he is notable, but the biography notability guidlines suggest that to have an article a person should be more notable than the average university professor. I do see how he is notable under the guideline that says, "The person made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field", but the article isn't really as clear in asserting that he has made such a widely recognized contribution and, more importantly, the article doesn't cite a source for his widely recognized contributions. Am I making any sense to you? ~ ONUnicorn (Talk / Contribs) 05:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC) (p.s., you can have your username and the date automatically added to your posts on talk pages by typing four of these ~ at the end.)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Djstates.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Djstates.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)