Dmollison

Welcome!

Hello, Dmollison, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as T G Purvis, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DThomsen8 (talk) 20:13, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

T G Purvis

Your first article, on T G Purvis was actually very well done. As a new article reviewer, I am going to tag it as an orphan (no links from other articles), and needing more links to other articles, and needing more categories. I encourage you to create other new articles of like quality, with links to and from the article and more categories. Also look at the talk page I added to your article, which is much like talk pages I added to Montague Dawson and Nicholas Pocock, British marine artists whose articles will provide you with other categories for your article. Adding appropriate templates to new articles is something I do as a reviewer, but I am always pleased when I see a new article with good talk page templates already there. You have made a very good start as a new contributor. Please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help or advice. --DThomsen8 (talk) 20:25, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Reply

Thanks for your comments.

I've edited the article trying to take account of all your points - please have a look and let me know what you think.

The worst perhaps is the "orphan" status. The only existing page on Wikipedia that mentions TGP is the one on his son Tom Purvis. I have added a link from that to TGP. [I should like to do some editing on the Tom Purvis page later ..]

The reason I wrote the article is that there is plenty of interest in (and sales of) TGP's paintings on the web (a Google search just now gave 2390 results), but no or very little accurate info on him. His correct dates of birth and death are only out there because I told the National Museum of Wales and one or two others about them some years ago. So I think an article on him on Wikipedia will be supplying a real public demand.

When you reply, use colons to indent, and use the signature (fourth icon from the right on the top edit bar) to sign your reply, which goes where the cursor points. Orphan status is easily corrected. Tom Purvis already has a link from the Purvis surname disambiguation page, so add TG, and TG's birthplace has a list of residents, just add a link there, too. I leave those for you, and after you add those two links, go ahead and remove the Orphan tag. I have replied here without checking out the history, but that will be next. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:28, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Dmollison. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Patrick Mollison, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 09:36, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Dear Gaia

I am well aware of the possibility of a conflict of interest. That is why I flagged up that Patrick Mollison was my father. And also why I've restricted my suggested edits to details of fact. They are pretty minor details, but as an enthusiastic supporter of Wikipedia, I do like its information to be correct.

I would have thought it more positive practice, rather than deleting corrections made in good faith, to ask for supporting evidence if you think that necessary. I didn't go into detail because these are just minor matters of fact.

Dmollison (talk) 15:46, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)