User talk:Dodger67/Archive 25
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Dodger67. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 |
Hi Dodger67
Could you tell me which parts specifically you feel are written like an advert? I'm very happy to work on it, but without knowing which parts you have an issue with it won't be possible.
Thanks John Cummings (talk) 09:30, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- John Cummings, The whole article has an advertorial tone, but one thing that really sticks out is when you use the term brand to refer to a company. A brand is merely a name or symbol, it doesn't do anything. There is also quite a bit of redundant content about the plant and its cultivation, we already have an article that covers it. Hope this helps. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:43, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Dodger67 I used the word brand because I'm unable to work out if it is a separate company or part of a another company and its just the trading name. I'll do some more research and change when I'm able. I included the cultivation and production process in the article as far as I can tell there are several cultivation methods and this is specfic to this fabric, I'll see what I can copy over. I guess part of the issue is that the fabric is exclusive to a single company, instead of something like Denim whos article has similar structure and content but doesn't 'feel' 'as advertisingy' because its widely manfactured. John Cummings (talk) 15:03, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- John Cummings, I just took another look at the article, it's turned out quite nice, well done! So what's next? If textiles are a particular interest you should have look around WP:WikiProject Textile Arts. Perhaps you could even initiate the process there to develop a suitable infobox for textiles, like you enquired about at some helpdesk. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Dodger67 I used the word brand because I'm unable to work out if it is a separate company or part of a another company and its just the trading name. I'll do some more research and change when I'm able. I included the cultivation and production process in the article as far as I can tell there are several cultivation methods and this is specfic to this fabric, I'll see what I can copy over. I guess part of the issue is that the fabric is exclusive to a single company, instead of something like Denim whos article has similar structure and content but doesn't 'feel' 'as advertisingy' because its widely manfactured. John Cummings (talk) 15:03, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
August Editathons at Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
In The End: There's Always A Disney God (TV Series)
The title of the draft also needs to be changed to In The End: There's Always A Disney God (Podcast) kennethmank13--Kennethmank13 (talk) 14:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Miss Grand
Hi, your recent speedy deletion of Miss Grand as WP:CSD#4 seems to be off the mark. You cited the 2017 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Grand International (3rd nomination) in your deletion rationale, but that appears to be different from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Grand, which was closed as no consensus just two weeks ago. This specific title should probably be restored. ✗plicit 13:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Excuse Me?
Your deletion of Miss Grand was entirely inappropriate, and in no way within policy. The page has never been deleted at AfD, bore no resemblance whatsoever to any deleted version of another page, and has for heaven's sake previously been subjected to the same G4 abuse which was overturned at DRV, which you surely would have noticed, had you bothered to check the page logs before unilaterally hitting delete (without providing due notification to the page creator). Please restore the page. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC), updated 20:34, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Explicit & Paul_012 I have restored the article. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
Technical news
- Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
Arbitration
- Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.
Miscellaneous
- You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.
A humourless pedant writes...
I thought "best experienced at a loud volume while drunk" was pretty good! --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:08, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:The Great Dance: A Hunter's Story
Hello, Dodger67. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Great Dance: A Hunter's Story, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Re: Jesse Pittman -
I understand that it's not a Memorial Site, I just wanted to document the 10 year anniversary of young man's death. Ranbush (talk) 16:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
- Ranbush, I appreciate that, it's just not done on Wikipedia. Try a blog or social media site. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello Rodger - I'm curious why this article today is different from what I posted about Jesse Pittman; "Arthur Sullivan (1896–1937) was an Australian recipient of the Victoria Cross. Born in South Australia, Sullivan enlisted in the Australian Imperial Force during World War I. Sent to the United Kingdom, he completed training after the Armistice came into effect ..." Is this article permitted because it is a historical figure? Ranbush (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Janet Sutherland
Hi,
Just a huge thanks for reviewing and editing my first wikipedia page. I'm very grateful. Still learning... I'm going to be adding some more pages on British poets. Thanks again and best wishes, Lesley LOCALISERS (talk) 12:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Paralympic Flag
The infobox is not visible in mobile version. Is necessary put the flag to the article has image to identify it better. NaviNews (talk) 01:38, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
September 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
- A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
- A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
- A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.
Technical news
- The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.
Thankseverso
|
For fixing that "page-move" |
| I didn't even know it had happened - thanks for catching that. Shearonink (talk) 15:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC) |
- Also, keeping in mind that my edit that precipitated their vandalism happened ages ago and that I do a fair amount of vandalism reversion/patrolling, would it be possible for my user & user-talk to be move-protected? When something like this happens once, makes me think it will happen again, especially if this editor comes back and repeats their "fun"... Cheers, Shearonink (talk) 15:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Shearonink, Done! I set the move protection at the highest "requires admin" level as there is practically no reason to ever move it. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Please watch user:HellmuSa
Hello, hope you are doing good. Please see this. HellmuSa has created his account 13 days ago. He's currently reviewing drafts. How's that possible? I think he's a sock of someone. Well experienced!! -- Sreeram Dilak
15:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikimedia South Africa invites you to the 2020/21 Wikimedia ZA AGM will be taking place online on 25 September 2021. See below for more details.
- Time: Saturday, 25 September 2021, starts at 10:00 to 16:00. With intermission at 13:00
- Location: held digitally online this link
We hope to see you there. Please let me know if you have any questions.--Schnabel Mchuchu (WMZA) (talk) 09:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021
Hello Dodger67,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Dodger67,
When you are correcting a bad move like this, could you leave a redirect? The Wikipedia bots are very effective at their job and when this page was moved to a different title, they changed all of the redirects to this page to point to the new location. If you leave a redirect when reversing a bad move, the bots should correct the redirects and they should be fixed. Without a redirect from the bad page title to the correct page title, the pages show up as broken redirects. This page is updated every six hours and if an admin or editor doesn't see and fix the broken redirects, the bot will delete them. After the redirects are corrected, the redirect from the bad title to the correct title can be deleted.
I don't think this little bot quirk is widely known among admins and page movers because it is very common to not leave a redirect when correcting a bad page move. Thank you! Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Liz, good to know, thanks. Were you able to fix it or do you need me to do something? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:11, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Maybe you can take a look at these two accounts...
I tried to look up where I should report this but got lost in the Wikipedia maze so am asking for some help here...
- Corey1216
- Cyeyeung1215
- Similar edits, accounts seem to be related. From listening to the posted YouTube channel the editor seems to be a somewhat young child.
I just couldn't figure out where to post my concerns or how to go about it. Hope you can look in to the situation. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 16:41, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Shearonink, I'm not sure what you're expecting of me? You found some vandalism and fixed it. Both edits are (so far) the only edits by the two accounts, so that seems to be the end of the matter. If you notice either vandal continuing beyond a final warning you can report it to WP:AIV. -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- They both seem to be one and the same, at the very least meatpuppet accounts if not socks, that's all. But yeah "they" are on my radar at this point... Shearonink (talk) 18:35, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
A little assistance at Makwan Amirkhani if possible?
Hello Dodger67, thanks for your feedback/advice in regards to the topic about nationality(citizen)/national/ethnicity. If I have not misunderstood you, I also felt the same as what you said and tried to correct a revert of my addition to the article, but was reverted. I think I have spent quite a lot of effort trying to explain, but with no luck. Please see talk page, they keep repeating the same belief based on their view of the guideline. --TataofTata (talk) 13:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
October 2021 at Women in Red
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – October 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, extended confirmed protection may be used preemptively on certain high-risk templates.
- Following a discussion at the Village Pump, there is consensus to treat discord logs the same as IRC logs. This means that discord logs will be oversighted if posted onwiki.
Technical news
- DiscussionTools has superseded Enterprisey's reply-link script. Editors may switch using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features.
Arbitration
- A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
- Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
- The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.
Miscellaneous
- Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
- The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Draft Page about Wendy Porch
Hi, I saw your decision about the page and the assessment that the linked articles had only passing mentions of Wendy Porch. While I recognise that to be true for some of them, it's not the case for all of them. Honestly, I gave up adding links to news stories about her because there are so many and once I got to double digits I concluded there was enough, but I invite you to check them all, in many she is the main focus of the article. And if you would like and would reconsider, I can delete the ones with passing mention only, spend more time finding ones where she is clearly the focus of the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CT55555 (talk • contribs) 04:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hi CT55555 If you could point out the best 3 or 4 sources that are independent and contain at least a paragraph or two about Porch, that should make the next review easier. Just leave a note at the top of the page for the next reviewer. It probably won't be me, as a variety of opinions provides a fairer assessment of a draft. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Dodger67 Thank you for the fast reply and the clear guidance. I'll work on that shortly.
Concern regarding Draft:Disability in Israel
Hello, Dodger67. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Disability in Israel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Thank you!
Hey Dodger67!
Just wanted to come by & thank you for telling me about GLAM over on Teahouse! I've familiarized myself with the group and its operations, and have reached out to two GLAM members who are geographically close to me. I'm still very green when it comes to Wikipedia, but I'd love to collaborate if you ever have any questions about the Cincinnati Art Museum or our collections & exhibitions!
Thanks again, EMI from CAM (talk) 16:30, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
Thanks for welcoming me to Wikipedia & introducing me to GLAM! EMI from CAM (talk) 16:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC) |
Concern regarding Draft:Disability in Spain
Hello, Dodger67. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Disability in Spain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2021 backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
Concern regarding Draft:Tetsuya Noguchi
Hello, Dodger67. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tetsuya Noguchi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.
Technical news
- Toolhub is a catalogue of tools which can be used on Wikimedia wikis. It is at https://toolhub.wikimedia.org/.
Arbitration
- GeneralNotability, Mz7 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections. Ivanvector and John M Wolfson are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves to stand in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections from 07 November 2021 until 16 November 2021.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of five new CheckUsers and two new Oversighters.
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
Greetings,
It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.
Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for November 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Insurgency in Cabo Delgado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SADC.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Orphan
Hi there! Just want to update you the new criteria for orphaned article is zero incoming link. The old criteria was at least 3 incoming links. Thanks! Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 12:29, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).
Administrator changes
Technical news
- Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
- The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections is open until 23:59, 06 December 2021 (UTC).
- The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Survey about History on Wikipedia
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 16:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Apolo1991 I'm South African and wondering if it really makes sense to limit your participants to only Americans when being a global resource is a major point of Wikipedia. Good luck with your Ph.D. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022 Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Merchandise giveaway nomination
|
A token of thanks
Hi Dodger67! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~
|
 |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
The WikiEagle - January 2022
 |
| The WikiEagle |
| The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter |
| Volume I — Issue 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Announcements
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Members
New Members
Number of active members: 386.
Total number of members: 921.
Closed Discussions
|
Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New/Ongoing Discussions
On The Main Page Did you know...
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.
- Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.
Arbitration
- Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Cabayi, Donald Albury, Enterprisey, Izno, Opabinia regalis, Worm That Turned, Wugapodes.
Miscellaneous
- The functionaries email list (functionaries-en
lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
If you write a journalist behind their name, then there will be no need to make their second page. Because there is a musician by this name.
If you write a journalist behind their name, then there will be no need to make their second page. Because there is a musician by this name.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Anshuman_Tiwari&redirect=no फ़िज़ा3 (talk) 07:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
FTR: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anshuman Tiwari Official. --bonadea contributions talk 08:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Josephine Sinyo
Hiya thanks for making Draft:Josephine Sinyo. I've cleaned it up and think it's ready to be mainspaced again, can you take a look and see what you think? Mujinga (talk) 13:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Mujinga Agree, I did a few small changes. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Cheers! Mujinga (talk) 14:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Redirect Delete
Hi Dodger67, good day from this end. please help delete this redirect Lisa Goddard so i can move in a draft I want to accept. thanks. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Idoghor Melody Done. -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Alright thanks. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 17:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
100,000 edits
Congrats on reaching the nice round figure of 100,000 edits! Greenman (talk) 12:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Greenman Thanks, I'm quite chuffed. Just a pity that edit #100,000 was a minor fix instead of some profound commentary or vital content... Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Five years! |
|---|
Small fixes are also important. I recently had my 2000th DYK nom (appearing), and it was a hook I didn't like, and the image not taken. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – February 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines have been published for consideration. Voting to ratify this guideline is planned to take place 7 March to 21 March. Comments can be made on the talk page.
Technical news
- The user group
oversightwill be renamedsuppressin around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections. - The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.
- The user group
Arbitration
- Community input is requested on several motions aimed at addressing discretionary sanctions that are no longer needed or overly broad.
- The Arbitration Committee has published a generalised comment regarding successful appeals of sanctions that it can review (such as checkuser blocks).
- A motion related to the Antisemitism in Poland case was passed following a declined case request.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2022 Steward elections will begin on 07 February 2022, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2022, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey is open until 11 February 2022.
WP:AFC Helper News
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
- AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
- The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
How do I get a Wikipedian ID?
If I go around collecting information with out any proof of being a Wikipedian won't people will take me for a spy or something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Un'stopableZed (talk • contribs) 14:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)