Domaniqs

Welcome!

Hello, Domaniqs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to LGBT-free zone does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Ixocactus (talk) 21:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Ixocactus! I know the thing and I'm going to AfD about this article. I can supply facts from reputable sources in the Polish government which were omitted in the discussed article. I think it would be best to show it during the discussion, as this is the lost cause at this stage here for me. Thank's again for your advice and support!Domaniqs (talk) 21:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to LGBT-free zone, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Ixocactus (talk) 20:28, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I followed your advice.Domaniqs (talk) 20:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to LGBT-free zone, you may be blocked from editing. Isabelle ^🔔 20:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry, not making many contributions, however I'm trying to make the Wikipedia better and to reflect the reality not some made up world, keeping it away from political or sociological divisions, hence my changes. The first change was reverted by ClueBot, so I filled the reasoning as it was false positive and posted the change again. Then another moderator (Ixocactus) pointed out, that I missed filling out the edit summary. Lack of routine, sorry. Then you got annoyed because of so many changes in such a short time. I bet you were perfect right from the start!Domaniqs (talk) 20:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Can you please remove this article as this is an upright propaganda having nothing with reality, pleaseDomaniqs (talk) 20:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

If you believe the article is a hoax (it isn't) you can send it to WP:AFD, where it is likely to be speed kept. You are likely to be sanctioned as well, if you keep going this line. Isabelle ^🔔 20:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

It as hoax, the title is not. That's all fuss about. Thank you for the tip!Domaniqs (talk) 21:04, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Again, I'd like to strongly discourage you from going that route. Isabelle ^🔔 21:08, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

why do you advise to keep away from this route Isabelle? Please explain, I am not that familiar with the procedures around here.Domaniqs (talk) 21:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

You say it's a hoax, due to those zones not being officially recognized, but that it already mentioned in the text: In July 2020, the Provincial Administrative Courts [...] in Gliwice and Radom ruled that the "LGBT ideology free zones" established by the local authorities [...] are null and void, stressing that they violate the constitution and are discriminatory against members of the LGBT community living in those counties. Not only that, it was previously sent to AFD with a very similar reasoning: Fake news, Russian trolls publish lying articles (emphasis mine). Sending to AFD will make it seem you are pushing for a WP:FRINGE point of view (a homophobic one, at that), especially after having attempted to blank the page three times. If, after reading all this, you still believe the article is a hoax and should be deleted, well, good luck. Isabelle ^🔔 21:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

I am not homophobic for starters. At all. You already described the ruling of the Polish court: "are null and void, stressing that they violate the constitution and are discriminatory against members of the LGBT community living in those counties" which in its essence shows the article is a hoax! There are no such zones anywhere in Poland, because these people, as any other people are protected by the constitution, which is above all other law in Poland. Even EU law cannot be above Polish constitution. I know, there is a lot of bias from Russia and other Asian countries trying to attack our infrastructure (I protect one of the Universities in the UK, so I know), many lefty people joined wikipedia yeeaars ago, so they did with social media like facebook and twitter to control what is said about them. Do you like what happened to Trump? No matter if he was guilty or not or if you like him or not. Do you think the political life should be controlled by moderators in social media and the information should be twisted by fake authors, just like in Soviet Union? I remember that, as I used to live in Soviet Block. That is why, I am determined to straighten this up, if needed, I will go to the court.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Notfrompedro (talk) 21:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know! I would gladly join them to explain my points if possible. I know a great deal of socio-economic and political situation in Poland. I won't let this lie residing on Wikipedia which is visited by our children to learn things.Domaniqs (talk) 22:01, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

what's make you think of that? I treat everyone with utmost courtesy, please give examples now! Because right now you are trying to threaten me.Domaniqs (talk) 21:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

• Why do I even try... Isabelle ^🔔 22:01, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

perhaps you believe in goodDomaniqs (talk) 22:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

do you see each others comments on my talk? Domaniqs (talk) 22:04, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Answer and I give you the reasonDomaniqs (talk) 22:05, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:10, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Domaniqs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

the screenshot of my talk and the reasoning of my motion to remove the article will be populated in media. I intend to show how discriminatory Wikipedia is. And is such discriminatory. I don't know what policies you follow but there is something really wrong about you guys. You know best, I did not make one discriminatory remark here Domaniqs (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Good, the more people who know not to make legal threats on Wikipedia the better. The more people who know not to blank Wikipedia articles, the better. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(edit conflict) Why do i say that? because you wrote, " if needed, I will go to the court." That constitues a legal threat. Now you want to go to the media. Feel free. Perhaps English is not your best language. To be unblocked, you must state clearly and without reservation that you withdraw the legal threat. While suing Wikipedia or it's editors is your right. You cannot edit here till the legal matter is resolved. Here's a policy we follow-- No Legal Threats --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

because I was threatened by you, that's why, so don't turn things around

I never threatened you. Calling bullshit. Never interacted with you till I made you aware of policy against making legal threats. You had already announced your intent to sue. So, you have a choice. Withdraw the legal threat or stay blocked. If you contact the media, please spell my user name correctly. Please sign your posts. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:37, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

and how do you call this, maybe your English is not your best language:"Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC) " Domaniqs (talk) 22:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

I didn't make any threat. so it was a threat to me

and what we're talking about BTW? nonsense

(edit conflict) Domaniqs, if you're going to continue to waste our time, I will revoke your access to this page. Sequence: you made the legal threat quoted by Deepfriedokra; Deepfriedokra warned you about legal threats; when it was clear that you had not the least idea of what you'd done wrong, I blocked you.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:46, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Floquenbeam (talk) 22:46, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

I can recognize a lost cause when I see one. You are not listening to anyone, and saying irrational things. It wastes other users' time. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:47, 10 September 2021 (UTC)