Dominus Noster

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dominus Noster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Sir or Ma'am. I was recently blocked as a sockpuppet of a banned user named Jupiter Optimus Maximus. The investigation against me was hackneyed and rushed and I have reason to believe, rigged. I complained about the obvious stupidity of my persecution on my talk-page, only to have it protected so that I couldn’t edit it, in a sinisterly Orwellian turn. I have asked numerous editors for help but they all seem to be in on the same conspiracy. It's like The Wicker Man. The key instigator in my plight is none other than User:IllaZilla who became obsessed with User:Jupiter Optimus Maximus after coming into conflict with him on Talk:Tin Man (TV miniseries). User:JOM had, as observed by many other users, made numerous positive contributions until encountering User:IllaZilla who then began to shamelessly stalk Jupiter by means of his contributions, of which he reverted most, if not all, often with very little explanation. He assumed ownership over many of the articles Jupiter edited (see in particular Azkadellia, Lord Voldemort and Megalomania) much to the annoyance of others. Ultimately Jupiter was exposed as a sockpuppet of blocked user User:YourLord. I caught IllaZilla’s attention when adding a List of fictional Emos to the Emo article. This evidently aggravated the extremely temperamental IllaZilla because he then immediately accused me of being a sockpuppet of Jupiter/YouLord and canvassed various other editors, including Sesshomaru, Collectonian and User:Magidin, all of whom had been in disagreement with Jupiter in the past and opened an investigation against me. I scarcely had time to defend myself before I was blocked, on account of a slight similarity in usernames and WP:DUCK, a completely nonsensical policy which I doubt you’ve even heard of. In any case, Sesshomaru and Collectonian had obviously made up their minds as to my identity as you’ll see by looking at their talkpages. One of the crutches of IllaZilla’s argument was that I had created an article entitled List of fictional narcissists which thanks to IllaZilla has since been deleted. Jupiter, like many users had an interest in psychoanalysing fictional characters. With regards to the List of fictional narcissists article, the list was actually not created by me but by an unregistered user on the Narcissism page. I observed that it was getting quite lengthy and so gave the List an article of it’s own. Numerous characters on the list were personal favourites of Jupiter and this was one of IllaZilla’s reasons for blocking me when in actuality they were already on the list when I copied it into its own article. Therefore it seems far more likely that the unregistered user on the Narcissism article is in fact a sockpuppet of Jupiter, especially given the fact that judging by their edit summary, they share his disdain for policies, a trait which I myself do not share. On an unrelated note I feel that policies have their uses but on account of my Inclusionist philosophy I believe that they are taken far too seriously. The bottom line is, I'm obviously not Jupiter Optimus Maximus, et al and I feel I deserve to be unblocked. I'm sure that in your wisdom you shall see sense and grant my wish. I humbly(ish) thank you for your time. --User:Dominus Noster

Decline reason:

My wisdom tells me that your behaviour matches Jupiter Optimus Maximus, so you'll have to email arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org to appeal. Thank you. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In any case, unblock request was added by 86.134.231.92 (talk · contribs) who has been editing since August the 13th and asked at the help desk today how to ask for an unblock. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/YourLord/Archive. Dougweller (talk) 14:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

For someone who claims not to be Jupiter Optimus Maximus, you have a suspiciously detailed knowledge of our past interactions. You're not fooling anyone. Your language, behavior, attitude, and IP address are all dead giveaways. --IllaZilla (talk) 18:42, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Stop calling me Jupiter! We both know perfectly well that I'm not Jupiter Optimus Maximus and that this little tantrum of yours is simply because you don't want another inclusionist competitor. Well JOM may have given in to your bullying IllaZilla but I'm afraid you've met your match with this model. I'm not going to go away, I'm going to conquer you! As for my detailed knowledge of your past interactions, I've done my research. Surely a man who stalks other users by means of their contributions shouldn't have a problem with that. --86.154.105.251 (talk) 17:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

*sigh* ... checkuser it is then... —Preceding unsigned comment added by IllaZilla (talk • contribs) 19:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/YourLord. Thank you. IllaZilla (talk) 18:56, 3 September 2009 (UTC)