Dommoor
December 2019
edit
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to William Happer. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Bishonen | talk 22:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Bishonen Your comment is a little bizarre considering that the existing phrase is pure opinion - and therefore violates wiki policy - there are no citations for it. Where are your references for the phrase: Happer is 'not a climate scientist and who rejects the scientific consensus on climate change'.
Why? Because there is no such thing as a Climate Scientist - it is a multidisciplinary subject covered by meteorologists, physicists, geologists et al. And - there is no consensus on climate change. Accuracy in science requires discussion - at no point do particles physicists take a 'consensus' on the existence of the big bang - they attempt to prove it. You are using an unverified, emotive, non-scientific word which needs removal.
You need to include references that aren't opinion that back up your phrase (references that aren't themselves opinion). Thank you. --Dommoor (talk) 12:18, 23 July 2020 (UTC)