User talk:Donald Albury/Archive 11

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Donald Albury in topic Cutler Bay
Archive 5Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 15

Administrators' newsletter – April 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).

  Administrator changes

  TheDJ
  XnualaCJOldelpasoBerean HunterJimbo WalesAndrew cKaranacsModemacScott

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion on the backlog of unpatrolled files, consensus was found to create a new user right for autopatrolling file uploads. Implementation progress can be tracked on Phabricator.
  • The BLPPROD grandfather clause, which stated that unreferenced biographies of living persons were only eligible for proposed deletion if they were created after March 18, 2010, has been removed following an RfC.
  • An RfC has closed with consensus to allow proposed deletion of files. The implementation process is ongoing.
  • After an unsuccessful proposal to automatically grant IP block exemption, consensus was found to relax the criteria for granting the user right from needing it to wanting it.

  Technical news

  • After a recent RfC, moved pages will soon be featured in a queue similar to Special:NewPagesFeed and require patrolling. Moves by administrators, page movers, and autopatrolled editors will be automatically marked as patrolled.
  • Cookie blocks have been deployed. This extends the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user if they switch accounts, even under a new IP.

Administrators' newsletter – May 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).

 

  Administrator changes

  KaranacsBerean HunterGoldenRingDlohcierekim
  GdrTyreniusJYolkowskiLonghairMaster Thief GarrettAaron BrennemanLaser brainJzGDragons flight

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Miscellaneous

  • Following an RfC, the editing restrictions page is now split into a list of active restrictions and an archive of those that are old or on inactive accounts. Make sure to check both pages if searching for a restriction.

Administrators' newsletter – June 2017

 

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).

  Administrator changes

  Doug BellDennis BrownClpo13ONUnicorn
  ThaddeusBYandmanBjarki SOldakQuillShyamJondelWorm That Turned

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Miscellaneous


Administrators' newsletter – July 2017

 

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).

  Administrator changes

  Happyme22Dragons flight
  Zad68

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Miscellaneous

  • A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
  • A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Wikipedia, and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
  • Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Wikipedia – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Wikipedia has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).

 

  Administrator changes

  AnarchyteGeneralizationsAreBadCullen328 (first RfA to reach WP:300)
  CpromptRockpocketRambo's RevengeAnimumTexasAndroidChuck SMITHMikeLynchCrazytalesAd Orientem

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news


Administrators' newsletter – September 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).

 

  Administrator changes

  NakonScott
  SverdrupThespianElockidJames086FfirehorseCelestianpowerBoing! said Zebedee

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
  • Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
  • In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

  Arbitration

  • Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

 

  Administrator changes

  Boing! said ZebedeeAnsh666Ad Orientem
  TonywaltonAmiDanielSilenceBanyanTreeMagioladitisVanamonde93Mr.Z-manJdavidbJakecRam-ManYelyosKurt Shaped Box

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
  • A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).

 

  Administrator changes

  LonghairMegalibrarygirlTonyBallioniVanamonde93
  Allen3Eluchil404Arthur RubinBencherlite

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Obituaries

  • The Wikipedia community has recently learned that Allen3 (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as JohnCD. Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Donald Albury. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).

 

  Administrator changes

  Joe Roe
  JzG
  EricorbitPercevalThinggTristanbVioletriga

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.

Administrators' newsletter – January 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).

 

  Administrator changes

  Muboshgu
  AnetodeLaser brainWorm That Turned
  None

  Bureaucrat changes

  Worm That Turned

  Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the administrator policy should be amended to require disclosure of paid editing activity at WP:RFA and to prohibit the use of administrative tools as part of paid editing activity, with certain exceptions.

  Technical news

  Arbitration


"Former country" infobox

Since you have edited a number of these articles in the past, whats your opinion on adding the infobox for "former countries" to ethnic, tribal and village organizations in the late prehistoric, protohistoric and early historic Florida and southeastern region? Another editor has begun adding the infobox (which I disagree with) to a number of these articles, sometimes removing and replacing other infoboxes in the process. ( see Tacatacuru revision history, Uzita (Florida), Pohoy , Tocobaga) The editor, User:Mangokeylime, seems to have a thing for infoboxes. Per our recent interactions (User:Mangokeylime#Mound Builders box and Talk:Mississippian culture#Mound Builders navbox) I'd rather have some neutral parties knowledgeable of the subjects to weigh in rather than me jumping in unilaterally on this issue. Thanks, and kind regards, Heiro 03:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  None
  BlurpeaceDana boomerDeltabeignetDenelson83GrandioseSalvidrim!Ymblanter

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has closed with a consensus that candidates at WP:RFA must disclose whether they have ever edited for pay and that administrators may never use administrative tools as part of any paid editing activity, except when they are acting as a Wikipedian-in-Residence or when the payment is made by the Wikimedia Foundation or an affiliate of the WMF.
  • Editors responding to threats of harm can now contact the Wikimedia Foundation's emergency address by using Special:EmailUser/Emergency. If you don't have email enabled on Wikipedia, directly contacting the emergency address using your own email client remains an option.

  Technical news

  • A tag will now be automatically applied to edits that blank a page, turn a page into a redirect, remove/replace almost all content in a page, undo an edit, or rollback an edit. These edits were previously denoted solely by automatic edit summaries.

  Arbitration


Proposed deletion of File:FLMap-Tequesta-tribe.PNG

 

The file File:FLMap-Tequesta-tribe.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 13:47, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  Lourdes
  AngelOfSadnessBhadaniChris 73CorenFridayMidomMike V
† Lourdes has requested that her admin rights be temporarily removed, pending her return from travel.

  Guideline and policy news

  • The autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) is scheduled to end on 14 March 2018. The results of the research collected can be read on Meta Wiki.
  • Community ban discussions must now stay open for at least 24 hours prior to being closed.
  • A change to the administrator inactivity policy has been proposed. Under the proposal, if an administrator has not used their admin tools for a period of five years and is subsequently desysopped for inactivity, the administrator would have to file a new RfA in order to regain the tools.
  • A change to the banning policy has been proposed which would specify conditions under which a repeat sockmaster may be considered de facto banned, reducing the need to start a community ban discussion for these users.

  Technical news

  • CheckUsers are now able to view private data such as IP addresses from the edit filter log, e.g. when the filter prevents a user from creating an account. Previously, this information was unavailable to CheckUsers because access to it could not be logged.
  • The edit filter has a new feature contains_all that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.

  Miscellaneous

  Obituaries

  • Bhadani (Gangadhar Bhadani) passed away on 8 February 2018. Bhadani joined Wikipedia in March 2005 and became an administrator in September 2005. While he was active, Bhadani was regarded as one of the most prolific Wikipedians from India.

Administrators' newsletter – April 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  331dotCordless LarryClueBot NG
  Gogo DodoPb30SebastiankesselSeicerSoLando

  Guideline and policy news

  • Administrators who have been desysopped due to inactivity are now required to have performed at least one (logged) administrative action in the past 5 years in order to qualify for a resysop without going through a new RfA.
  • Editors who have been found to have engaged in sockpuppetry on at least two occasions after an initial indefinite block, for whatever reason, are now automatically considered banned by the community without the need to start a ban discussion.
  • The notability guideline for organizations and companies has been substantially rewritten following the closure of this request for comment. Among the changes, the guideline more clearly defines the sourcing requirements needed for organizations and companies to be considered notable.
  • The six-month autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) ended on 14 March 2018. The post-trial research report has been published. A request for comment is now underway to determine whether the restrictions from ACTRIAL should be implemented permanently.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee is considering a change to the discretionary sanctions procedures which would require an editor to appeal a sanction to the community at WP:AE or WP:AN prior to appealing directly to the Arbitration Committee at WP:ARCA.

  Miscellaneous

  • A discussion has closed which concluded that administrators are not required to enable email, though many editors suggested doing so as a matter of best practice.
  • The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team has released the Interaction Timeline. This shows a chronologic history for two users on pages where they have both made edits, which may be helpful in identifying sockpuppetry and investigating editing disputes.

Administrators' newsletter – May 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  None
  ChochopkCoffeeGryffindorJimpKnowledge SeekerLankiveilPeridonRjd0060

  Guideline and policy news

  • The ability to create articles directly in mainspace is now indefinitely restricted to autoconfirmed users.
  • A proposal is being discussed which would create a new "event coordinator" right that would allow users to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit.

  Technical news

  • AbuseFilter has received numerous improvements, including an OOUI overhaul, syntax highlighting, ability to search existing filters, and a few new functions. In particular, the search feature can be used to ensure there aren't existing filters for what you need, and the new equals_to_any function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to Logstash.
  • When blocking anonymous users, a cookie will be applied that reloads the block if the user changes their IP. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. This currently only occurs when hard-blocking accounts.
  • The block notice shown on mobile will soon be more informative and point users to a help page on how to request an unblock, just as it currently does on desktop.
  • There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

  Arbitration

  Obituaries

  • Lankiveil (Craig Franklin) passed away in mid-April. Lankiveil joined Wikipedia on 12 August 2004 and became an administrator on 31 August 2008. During his time with the Wikimedia community, Lankiveil served as an oversighter for the English Wikipedia and as president of Wikimedia Australia.

Lemon-rumped tanager

Hello Donald. I was the AfC reviewer for the draft of Lemon-rumped tanager. Despite having been created by a blocked user it appeared to me to be a valuable contribution to Wikipedia, being an article on an endangered species. Could it be reinstated? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia policy (WP:BMB) is quite clear on this. Any edits by a banned user are to be deleted, no matter how good the quality of the edits is. There is nothing, however, that would prevent an editor in good standing from creating a new article on the subject. - Donald Albury 18:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Does the following from WP:BANREVERT not apply here? If editors other than the banned editor have made good-faith contributions to the page or its talk page, it is courteous to inform them that the page was created by a banned editor, and then decide on a case-by-case basis what to do. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Also, strictly speaking, the draft was created by the banned user, it was me that moved it to mainspace? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The text of the article was not changed after Rowrow yo boat created it. It is such a short article that it would be easier to just create a new article instead of restoring the deleted version. I would also note that Rowrow yo boat was blocked on April 22 as a confirmed sockpuppet. If you want to pursue having the article restored, you can apply at WP:Deletion review, but please note the statement in the section Purpose. - Donald Albury 20:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

Page protection

Hi you recently reverted my request for page protection on Vietinbank VC. Did I make an error when submitting the request? I used Twinkle. Dom from Paris (talk) 08:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

No need to reply I just saw the self revert. Thanks Dom from Paris (talk) 08:52, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  None
  Al Ameer sonAliveFreeHappyCenariumLupoMichaelBillington

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in June. This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.
  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team will build granular types of blocks in 2018 (e.g. a block from uploading or editing specific pages, categories, or namespaces, as opposed to a full-site block). Feedback on the concept may be left at the talk page.
  • There is now a checkbox on Special:ListUsers to let you see only users in temporary user groups.
  • It is now easier for blocked mobile users to see why they were blocked.

  Arbitration

  • A recent technical issue with the Arbitration Committee's spam filter inadvertently caused all messages sent to the committee through Wikipedia (i.e. Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee) to be discarded. If you attempted to send an email to the Arbitration Committee via Wikipedia between May 16 and May 31, your message was not received and you are encouraged to resend it. Messages sent outside of these dates or directly to the Arbitration Committee email address were not affected by this issue.

  Miscellaneous


Vandalism?

A discussion about changing the wording of "Islamic calendar" on the article talk page is hardly "vandalism". 2A00:23C0:7980:9900:296B:BC4E:9A58:5786 (talk) 12:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

You dropped in the same 10,285 byte block of text that you had earlier dropped into The language reference desk. Copying a large block of text from another location to a discussion page is disruptive to Wikipedia. - Donald Albury 12:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Both the article and its talkpage are protected. How do you suggest editors discuss improvements to the article? 2A00:23C0:7980:9900:296B:BC4E:9A58:5786 (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Did you see the above message before you posted on my talk page? 2A00:23C0:7980:9900:296B:BC4E:9A58:5786 (talk) 12:38, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Please note that Talk:Islamic calendar was protected today after your most recent posts had been reverted. Please take some time off from this subject. Protection will eventually be removed, and you can participate in the discussion again. But, please, do not copy large chunks of previous discussion and drop them in a talk page, or into an unrelated venue. That is disruptive. - Donald Albury 12:46, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
I can assure you that if the matter is raised again at the talk page it will be re-protected for a longer period. When an article contains glaring inaccuracies they need to be speedily removed, which means raising the matter at the most appropriate accessible venue. 2A00:23C0:7980:9900:296B:BC4E:9A58:5786 (talk) 12:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Which is NOT Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language. Nor should you try to raise the matter by copying in a block of older discussion. -- Donald Albury 13:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
What, in your view, is "the most appropriate accessible venue"? 2A00:23C0:7980:9900:296B:BC4E:9A58:5786 (talk) 13:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Note: CheckUser proves ian.thomson wrong:
  • 09:15 16 July 2016 "Vote (Y) for Change" is created
  • 12:04 16 July 2016 ian.thomson makes five log entries: [1]
  • CheckUser confirms "Vote (X) for Change" and "Vote (Y) for Change" are   Unrelated. 81.139.242.56 (talk) 15:23, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
And we have another IP bringing in spurious claims based on info they wouldn't have, that could potentially trick someone who doesn't look at it too long. Yep, it's VXFC alright. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
An IP offering checkuser results on its first edit. Huh! - Donald Albury 16:42, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
(edit conflict)I am 78.145.17.144, the editor who was quoted in the discussion which you deleted. Note that I was blocked although I had not edited. How can administrators identify an editor from no edits? Ian.thomson does not dispute the correctness of the CheckUser result. To put this beyond doubt, please userfy the deleted pages, the content of which consists of four edits by "Vote (Y) for Change". They can then be checked against edits signed by "Vote (X) for Change", thus providing unchallengeable behavioural evidence that the editors are different people. 78.145.114.34 (talk) 16:50, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

The note below indicates my submission has copyright issues. Was it links? Give me a hint and I'll try to find the correct way to submit. I WROTE the material myself for the inclusion on our community history. Any photos I include are mine.

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Chumuckla, Florida has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This applies to the material headed "A Summary History of Chunuckla, Fl. - Donald Albury 12:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Me3tv (talkcontribs)

@Me3tv: The material you added was identical to material from this site. It's not our text so we can't host it unless the author formally donates the copyrighted material to us. However, even if you formally donated the material, that site doesn't meet our reliable sourcing standards (it's self-published, not professionally published) so we couldn't use it anyway. For a variety of reasons, we prefer it when editors summarize and paraphrase what professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources say on a subject rather that writing from their own knowledge and personal experience. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:37, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the insight. I guess I'll have to get a local newspaper to publish our community history and then you can use it? It was written by ME published (without minor corrections in the current version) on our US Congressman's website for 8 or more years. Jeff Miller (R) District 1 FL. this site He has since retired from congress. The history was written up by me since I am familiar with local history, though I am not an academic historian. I am a local author.

I see the point of Wikipedia carefully filtering sources. IF I can find time to provide this material through acceptable channels I will. The reason I wanted this on there was because the small amount of information now seemed to focus on a defunct and image detracting "Red Neck Parade" (great idea for a few years and then it became a nuisance to the community as revenue and entertainment demands grew. It would be great if the work originally carried by our Congressman's page (I wrote it) eventually gets accepted as a resource about our community. At the very least it would be good to provide a link to the same text noted above. I wish the "redneck parade" references were less prominent.

I'll also try to provide information to certify myself for future edits.

me3tv  Vic Campbell Me3tv (talk) 15:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Even if you get it published in a local newspaper, you cannot just copy it into Wikipedia. Any material copied into Wikipedia from another site must be in the public domain or licensed for free distribution, and must be attributed to the source. Everything put into a Wikipedia article must be verifiable, that is, it must be possible to cite a reliable source that supports the material, and it is recommended to preemptively include such citations for anything that may be challenged. Original research is not allowed. Most Wikipedia editors are not academics or certified experts in the area of articles they work on. The Wikipedia community has explicitly rejected any kind of system for certifying editors as experts. Please look at Hogtown, Florida, for an example of how a small article on local history incorporates citations to sources. Please sign your posts on talk pages by placing 4 tildes, ~~~~ , at the end of you comment. - Donald Albury 16:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

MAST Academy edits

I didn't add citations because I got the information from already cited sources. The links that are still there show the updated school demographics and such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexcast1015 (talkcontribs) 13:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

The reference you were relying on is three years old. I have changed the infobox to reflect grade levels and enrollment currently reported on the school's web site. If you can find a recent independent source for the current enrollment, by all means use it, but please don't use an old source for something that changes every year. - Donald Albury 15:05, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

History of Florida

See my recent edits on the editor's talk page. Besides the poor writing style, I think it's pretty clear that he is doing original research at best, eg this edit. His latest edits at History of Florida seem to misrepresent his source. I meant to post this last night but somehow didn't See my talk page as well. He seems to have had problems before. Doug Weller talk 11:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

New posters at top

Recently you got two messages about Florida stuff from IPs but they unfortunately left them at the top of your talk page. Those messages might need to be moved down into the normal location. These guys might be new and may be unaware of WP:SOCK but it's possible they could have some knowledge. Here is a rangecontrib from the /16 that they are in. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 17:26, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Those posts are about different articles. Both IPs seem to have enough experience with WP to be able to allude to some policies. - Donald Albury 18:12, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Cades Pond culture and the use of Original Research (WP:OR) as reliabe source

Hello Donald. In the Cades_Pond_culture article you made edits using this source of information:

Wallis, Neill (June–September 2016). "Climate Change and Ritual Intervention? An Egnimatic Sinkhole Pond and the End of Cades Pond Culture". The Florida Anthropologist. 69 (2-3): 89–110 – via Academia.edu.

If you take the time to familiarize yourself with WP:OR you will realize yourself the source cited above (Wallis, Neill, Climate Change....) constitute Original Research. The study you cited (Climate Change...) is not referenced by any other works, books or studies. Wallis, Neill is not a well cited and referenced specialist either. It constitute Original Research. While the speculation and information contained in the study (Climate Change...) and other work by Wallis are interesting (a delight to read), it doesn't constitute encyclopedic material yet. It's a very interesting study, with interesting speculation and facts, but it also constitute original research not referenced by other sources. In the future (with further research), it may become encyclopedic material. Thank you for your attention. 69.159.164.75 (talk) 03:34, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:No original research again. That policy defines "original research" (OR) as "material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist." The policy states that "exists" means "that the reliable source must have been published and still exist—somewhere in the world, in any language, whether or not it is reachable online—even if no source is currently named in the article. Articles that currently name zero references of any type may be fully compliant with this policy—so long as there is a reasonable expectation that every bit of material is supported by a published, reliable source."
As for your comments about Neill Wallis, he is a professional archaeologist and Assistant Curator of Florida Archaeology at the Florida Museum of Natural History.[1] The reference you are challenging, (Wallis, Neill (June–September 2016). "Climate Change and Ritual Intervention? An Egnimatic Sinkhole Pond and the End of Cades Pond Culture". The Florida Anthropologist. 69 (2–3): 89–110 – via Academia.edu.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)), was published in The Florida Anthropologist, a peer-reviewed journal, and, per WP:SCHOLARSHIP, acceptable as a reliable source. If you believe that Neill Wallis is not a reliable author, or that the specific article is not a reliable source, then you need to gain the consensus of the community in support of that position at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. -- Donald Albury 19:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ "Neill J. Wallis". University of Florida College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. Retrieved June 18, 2018. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)

Citations

Hi Donald,

I had a look at what you did in Francisco Menéndez Márquez and it looks great. Easy to find the information and clearly laid out. A the risk of gilding a lily, might I suggest a small improvement? When you use the {{cite}} family of templates, enable Harvard references: {{cite thesis|last=Borgen|first=Linda Suzanne Cecelia|title=Prelude to Rebellion: Diego de Rebolledo vs. Lúcas Menéndez in Mid-17th Century Spanish Florida|year=2011|publisher=University of West Florida|location=Pensacola, Florida|url=http://etd.fcla.edu/WF/WFE0000264/Borgen_Linda_Suzanne_Cecelia_201105_MA.pdf|ref=harv}}. This sets up a link to the citation. Next, instead of using <ref>Borgen: 16, 64</ref> and <ref>Borgen: 45-47</ref>, you could use {{sfn|Borgen|2011|pp=16, 64}} and {{sfn|Borgen|2011|pp=45-47}}. the effect is to link all the references to the citations:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.[1] Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.[2]

References

  1. ^ Borgen 2011, pp. 16, 64.
  2. ^ Borgen 2011, pp. 45–47.

Borgen, Linda Suzanne Cecelia (2011). Prelude to Rebellion: Diego de Rebolledo vs. Lúcas Menéndez in Mid-17th Century Spanish Florida (PDF) (Thesis). Pensacola, Florida: University of West Florida. {{cite thesis}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

Now clicking on "Borgen 2011" highlights (and if far enough, take you to) the actual citation. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 13:40, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments. I have tried using Harvard references, and was not comfortable with them. I hadn't done much in creating articles for a number of years, and wasn't aware of all the available aids for creating citations until recently. I have started using Template:Efn (well, once, it isn't needed in every article). - Donald Albury 14:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Please forgive the intrusion, but in reply to Martin of Sheffield, I am the editor who reformatted the refs, edited the article and rewrote it to rescue it from the sad state it was in when I began editing it in November 2015. I don't like using Harvard refs because they are one-way links and actually make navigating an article more difficult, since when you click on one, you have to scroll back to where you were in the article. They are not required by WP policy, and I much prefer using the Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books to quickly generate citations of books accesible in Google Books. Carlstak (talk) 15:05, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Oops, my apologies for responding to a post about "Francisco Menéndez Márquez" rather than "Pedro Menéndez Márquez". I seem to be developing dyslexia in my old age. Carlstak (talk) 19:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
That is perfectly understandable with the Menéndez Márquez family. Four articles about members of the family, and I never did get around to creating an article about Tomás's son Francisco, who shared a name with his great-great-great-uncle or great-great-grandfather (depending on how much you credit the old gossip). - Donald Albury 19:26, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miami blue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  PbsouthwoodTheSandDoctor
  Gogo Dodo
  AndrevanDougEVulaKaisaLTony FoxWilyD

  Bureaucrat changes

  AndrevanEVula

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about the deletion of drafts closed with a consensus to change the wording of WP:NMFD. Specifically, a draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined at AfC without any substantial improvement may be deleted at MfD if consensus determines that it is unlikely to ever meet the requirements for mainspace and it otherwise meets one of the reasons for deletion outlined in the deletion policy.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus that the {{promising draft}} template cannot be used to indefinitely prevent a WP:G13 speedy deletion nomination.

  Technical news

  • Starting on July 9, the WMF Security team, Trust & Safety, and the broader technical community will be seeking input on an upcoming change that will restrict editing of site-wide JavaScript and CSS to a new technical administrators user group. Bureaucrats and stewards will be able to grant this right per a community-defined process. The intention is to reduce the number of accounts who can edit frontend code to those who actually need to, which in turn lessens the risk of malicious code being added that compromises the security and privacy of everyone who accesses Wikipedia. For more information, please review the FAQ.
  • Syntax highlighting has been graduated from a Beta feature on the English Wikipedia. To enable this feature, click the highlighter icon ( ) in your editing toolbar (or under the hamburger menu in the 2017 wikitext editor). This feature can help prevent you from making mistakes when editing complex templates.
  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in July (previously scheduled for June). This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.

  Miscellaneous

  • Currently around 20% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 17% a year ago. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless if you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

Thanks

Hello DA. It isn't often that edits like yours and mine come so close together. Thanks for taking the time to double check on what happened. I did start a thread on the talk page in case the IP editor continues with the unsourced material. I hope you enjoy the rest of your weekend. MarnetteD|Talk 02:49, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Content edited as per your suggestion, please review

Hi, I have edited all the content of the user page as per your suggestions. Also, Mohsin Jameel is not a crypto-currency broker. He is owner of Crypto-currency (Buxcoin) but this profile is not created for promotion of any cryptocurrency. Kindly suggest if any more changes required.--Mohsin Jameel MJ (talk) 09:26, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:207.253.2.17

Pretty sure this is a goof creation. Think you meant it to be a user talk.   Home Lander (talk) 01:55, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Question

You read the question? What is the reason it is NPOV not APOV or SPOV? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1:F19E:32F1:8CE2:1ABA:193B:423A (talk) 01:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Ashford Carbonell

Thankyou for dealing with the disruption there but wouldn't it make more sense to protect it for a whole year as this has now been going on for nearly 2 years and the user has made it clear that they will just continue to add that content when the protection expires. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:39, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

Administrators' newsletter – August 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  Sro23
  KaisaLYmblanter

  Guideline and policy news

  • After a discussion at Meta, a new user group called "interface administrators" (formerly "technical administrator") has been created. Come the end of August, interface admins will be the only users able to edit site-wide JavaScript and CSS pages like MediaWiki:Common.js and MediaWiki:Common.css, or edit other user's personal JavaScript and CSS. The intention is to improve security and privacy by reducing the number of accounts which could be used to compromise the site or another user's account through malicious code. The new user group can be assigned and revoked by bureaucrats. Discussion is ongoing to establish details for implementing the group on the English Wikipedia.
  • Following a request for comment, the WP:SISTER style guideline now states that in the mainspace, interwiki links to Wikinews should only be made as per the external links guideline. This generally means that within the body of an article, you should not link to Wikinews about a particular event that is only a part of the larger topic. Wikinews links in "external links" sections can be used where helpful, but not automatically if an equivalent article from a reliable news outlet could be linked in the same manner.

  Technical news


Mowat

Hi, why are you "fixing" links which are not broken? DuncanHill (talk) 00:14, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@DuncanHill: Because when I looked at History of Jacksonville, [[Charles L Mowat]] was a red link. Sometimes it takes a while for new articles to be indexed. - Donald Albury 00:31, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
OK. DuncanHill (talk) 12:13, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Mangroves

I'm waiting for an acknowledgement that your accusations regarding my edit to mangrove were false. Regards, WolfmanSF (talk) 20:12, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for resolving this issue. WolfmanSF (talk) 01:27, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

Administrators' newsletter – September 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  None
  AsterionCrisco 1492KFKudpungLizRandykittySpartaz
  Optimist on the runVoice of Clam

  Interface administrator changes

  AmorymeltzerMr. StradivariusMusikAnimalMSGJTheDJXaosflux

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a "stop-gap" discussion, six users have temporarily been made interface administrators while discussion is ongoing for a more permanent process for assigning the permission. Interface administrators are now the only editors allowed to edit sitewide CSS and JavaScript pages, as well as CSS/JS pages in another user's userspace. Previously, all administrators had this ability. The right can be granted and revoked by bureaucrats.

  Technical news

  • Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour.
  • Some abuse filter variables have changed. They are now easier to understand for non-experts. The old variables will still work but filter editors are encouraged to replace them with the new ones. You can find the list of changed variables on mediawiki.org. They have a note which says Deprecated. Use ... instead. An example is article_text which is now page_title.
  • Abuse filters can now use how old a page is. The variable is page_age.

  Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has resolved to perform a round of Checkuser and Oversight appointments. The usernames of all applicants will be shared with the Functionaries team, and they will be requested to assist in the vetting process. The deadline to submit an application is 23:59 UTC, 12 September, and the candidates that move forward will be published on-wiki for community comments on 18 September.

Phoenix (East Indiaman)

Hi Donald Albury, I am going to have to revert most of your edits to that article. I have two reasons for doing so. First, you are destroying information that it took me a long time to assemble. Second, the article is not a disambiguation page. It is a ship index page, and so the rules for DAB pages do not apply. Regards, Acad Ronin (talk) 16:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Sorry about that. My mistake. I just posted an apology on your talk page. - Donald Albury 16:46, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Miami

I must be older than you, I was told that your way of pronouncing it was for the Ohio Miami. Doug Weller talk 19:25, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

But I agree that yours is the current pronunciation. Doug Weller talk 19:26, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
I grew up in Miami in the late '40s and the '50s. And I suspect I used to say MY-am-eh. Now, I had an uncle, who was born and raised in Miami, who insisted the proper pronunciation was MY-am-uh. I'm not sure about most of my parents and my other uncles and aunts (all born and raised in Miami), but I know that one aunt says MY-am-ee. - Donald Albury 19:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
I grew up in Miami in the 60s and 70s, and I never heard anyone say it in any other way than my-AM-ee. But then my parents were from Philadelphia and moved there in the 50s. But my schoolmates said my-AM-ee and so did the news and it was never the My-AM-uh Dolphins. It's like the county Gainesville is in, Alachua. Some say Al-AH-chew-uh, some say Al-AH-chew-way and some say Al-ah-CHEW-uh. --Ebyabe (talk) 16:56, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Speaking of the pronunciation of Alachua, see the last part of this. - Donald Albury 17:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Heh. When my father was flying to Florida to prepare for our move to Miami in 1959, my brother and I would hear him talking about "My Ami", so we told everybody we were going to "Daddy's Ami". Carlstak (talk) 11:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
My aunt has talked about when they were living elsewhere in Florida, her children asked her when were they going to "your Ami." - Donald Albury 12:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
I was born in Jackson Memorial Hospital in 1942, left Miami in '59 to go off to Yale. I'm pretty sure we all said 'uh'. But everything has changed. I lived on NW 14th Ct. near the corner of 7th Street (near the Orange Bowl which of course is gone). Behind the houses across the road was, literally, sub-tropical jungle with snakes, possums, banyan trees, a bit of swamp, etc. Now it's the Miami River Commission and various other buildings in a landscaped area.[2]. My grandparents house was taken by the new elevated road, and our old house is gone too. Doug Weller talk 20:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
I was born in Victoria Hospital in 1943. We lived in Allapattah until 1955. I remember when most of the lots around us were vacant, covered with pines and palmettos. By the time we moved to North Miami, there were no vacant lots left. My father's parents' house, which was in the 1200 block of N.W. 7th Ct., and in which they had lived for about 55 years, was taken for the exchange between I-95 and the Dolphin Expressway. I don't have much of a Southern accent left (I do conflate 'pen' and 'pin', though). That may be because most of my fellow students at North Miami HS were from the North. - Donald Albury 22:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

DiHydrogen Monoxide Page

Thanks for the correction, I think I was confusing the list with the category. Thanks for the catch. Squatch347 (talk) 16:56, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Little Haiti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miami River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

Administrators' newsletter – October 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  JustlettersandnumbersL235
  BgwhiteHorsePunchKidJ GrebKillerChihuahuaRami RWinhunter

  Interface administrator changes

  Cyberpower678Deryck ChanOshwahPharosRagesossRitchie333

  Oversight changes

  Guerillero NativeForeigner SnowolfXeno

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Partial blocks should be available for testing in October on the Test Wikipedia and the Beta-Cluster. This new feature allows admins to block users from editing specific pages and in the near-future, namespaces and uploading files. You can expect more updates and an invitation to help with testing once it is available.
  • The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team is currently looking for input on how to measure the effectiveness of blocks. This is in particular related to how they will measure the success of the aforementioned partial blocks.
  • Because of a data centre test, you will be able to read but not edit the Wikimedia projects for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time.

  Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has, by motion, amended the procedure on functionary inactivity.
  • The community consultation for 2018 CheckUser and Oversight appointments has concluded. Appointments will be made by October 11.
  • Following a request for comment, the size of the Arbitration Committee will be decreased to 13 arbitrators, starting in 2019. Additionally, the minimum support percentage required to be appointed to a two-year term on ArbCom has been increased to 60%. ArbCom candidates who receive between 50% and 60% support will be appointed to one-year terms instead.
  • Nominations for the 2018 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission are being accepted until 12 October. These are the editors who help run the ArbCom election smoothly. If you are interested in volunteering for this role, please consider nominating yourself.

Hurston Quote

Did Hurston spell Okeechobee wrong in his book? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AllanHood (talkcontribs) 15:20, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

She spelled it that way in the book. I looked in the book to be sure before I reverted you. - Donald Albury 15:37, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of indigenous peoples, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luhya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Partial blocks is now available for testing on the Test Wikipedia. The new functionality allows you to block users from editing specific pages. Bugs may exist and can be reported on the local talk page or on Meta. A discussion regarding deployment to English Wikipedia will be started by community liaisons sometime in the near future.
  • A user script is now available to quickly review unblock requests.
  • The 2019 Community Wishlist Survey is now accepting new proposals until November 11, 2018. The results of this survey will determine what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year. Voting on the proposals will take place from November 16 to November 30, 2018. Specifically, there is a proposal category for admins and stewards that may be of interest.

  Arbitration

  • Eligible editors will be invited to nominate themselves as candidates in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 4 until November 13. Voting will begin on November 19 and last until December 2.
  • The Arbitration Committee's email address has changed to arbcom-en wikimedia.org. Other email lists, such as functionaries-en and clerks-l, remain unchanged.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cacique, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chacao (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fred Bauder

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fred Bauder. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fred Bauder/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 27, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fred Bauder/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, --Cameron11598 (Talk) 21:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Donald Albury. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Donald Albury. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Lake Highland Preparatory School

Wow! In my opinion, that was a harsh thing to do to MasterfulNerd. Sure, the Nerd added bare links, but you could have mentioned that. The tag on the page said more references were needed. That's what we got, even if they weren't perfect. If the entries in the Notable people section were sufficient, you could have deleted the tag. Best, Rhadow (talk) 23:12, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

Administrators' newsletter – December 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  Al Ameer sonRandykittySpartaz
  BosonDaniel J. LeivickEfeEsanchez7587Fred BauderGarzoMartijn HoekstraOrangemike

  Interface administrator changes

 Deryck Chan

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, the Mediation Committee is now closed and will no longer be accepting case requests.
  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether members of the Bot Approvals Group should satisfy activity requirements in order to remain in that role.
  • A request for comment is in progress regarding whether to change the administrator inactivity policy, such that administrators "who have made no logged administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped". Currently, the policy states that administrators "who have made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped".
  • A proposal has been made to temporarily restrict editing of the Main Page to interface administrators in order to mitigate the impact of compromised accounts.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • In late November, an attacker compromised multiple accounts, including at least four administrator accounts, and used them to vandalize Wikipedia. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. Sharing the same password across multiple websites makes your account vulnerable, especially if your password was used on a website that suffered a data breach. As these incidents have shown, these concerns are not pure fantasies.
  • Wikipedia policy requires administrators to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.

  Obituaries


Norwegian Encore 169,145GT

Please read the shipyard Meyer Werft latest press news.

Keel laying ceremony for the Norwegian Encore

Work begins on building the fourth ship in the Breakaway-Plus class for Norwegian Cruise Line

Keel laying for yet another ship in the Breakaway Plus class for Norwegian Cruise Line. Shareholders and directors of the American shipping company were joined by representatives of MEYER WERFT for the keel laying ceremony. During the ceremony, block 3 of the 169,145 GT ship was lowered into position in the shipyard’s covered building dock II. The block is 19.8 meters long, 40.4 meters wide and weighs 558 tons.

Andy Stuart, President of Norwegian Cruise Line, placed the traditional lucky cent under the block before the 800 ton crane lifted the structure weighing 350 tons into position in the building dock. “It’s great that we can celebrate the keel laying ceremony for the Norwegian Encore today with our partner MEYER WERFT”, says Andy Stuart. “The start of production is an important milestone, and we can rest assured in the shipyard’s expertise to build yet another first-class ship with the Norwegian Encore.” The ship will be finished in just 11 months before heading out to the North Sea for its sea trials. The Norwegian Encore is the fourth ship in the Breakaway-Plus class and will be completed by MEYER WERFT for Norwegian Cruise Line in autumn 2019.

“Today we have placed again a new of about 90 blocks in the building dock,” says Stephan Schmees, Executive Board Member Project Management of MEYER WERFT. “It is with great pride that we perform the keel laying ceremony today to symbolize the start of production for the ship. In autumn 2019, this will be the twelfth ship to be handed over to our long-standing customer Norwegian Cruise Line.” The order books are full at MEYER WERFT right through to 2023. The shipyard is constantly on the look-out for skilled qualified workers.

The cruise liner measures 333.46 meters in length and 41.4 meters in width, offering capacity for 4,200 passengers. The new-build will combine all the advantages of the Norwegian Breakaway-Plus class and has an additional deck to offer the passengers many added features and attractions.

https://www.meyerwerft.de/en/meyerwerft_de/medien/presseticker/pressemitteilung_detail_30401.jsp — Preceding unsigned comment added by NCL FANS (talkcontribs) 13:06, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Napoleon Broward

He called on Congress "to purchase territory, either domestic or foreign, and provide means to purchase the property of the negroes at a reasonable price and to transport them to the territory purchased by the United States." deisenbe (talk) 22:19, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

If I may...

The only thing I have lacked since returning from years of doing other things that were not Wikipedia (I know, the temerity of it all, right?)is the ability to block incorrigible editors from making obvious blockable offences. Others are willing and capable and relatively timely in doing so, no big deal. Secondly, seeing pending changes pages would be helpful to have back; and I would be remiss not to mention that admin/ sysops have a higher degree of gravitas in things like page reviews and discussion areas. Best of luck in all your endevours. Regards, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 04:56, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Well, if you look at my edit history, my participation in Wikipedia has waxed and waned (I made only 15 edits in 2017). A few years ago I was all for pending changes to be made universal, but I'm not happy with how it works on the few pages it is currently applied to. - Donald Albury 13:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited State College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maryland State College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Inserting unnecessary spaces

Mr. Albury - I was noticing on my browser, for whatever reason, that what is appearing on my screen in some wiki articles were words that did not have enough spece between them. After I received your message I showed my colleague, and after viewing the articl(es) in question via his browser, that the problem indeed is my system. I will not edit any further articles on my compu until I get this tech issue resolved. Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and my apologies if I concerned you. JerricaB (talk) 21:00, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Merry

  Happy Christmas!
Hello DA,
Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that

Nobody could have had a noisier Christmas Eve. And when the firemen turned off the hose and were standing in the wet, smoky room, Jim's Aunt, Miss. Prothero, came downstairs and peered in at them. Jim and I waited, very quietly, to hear what she would say to them. She said the right thing, always. She looked at the three tall firemen in their shining helmets, standing among the smoke and cinders and dissolving snowballs, and she said, "Would you like anything to read?"

My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD|Talk 19:07, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest

Hi Donald, I just received a msg from you about my edit to the Pensacola page, stating that I had a conflict of interest with the page. Other than visiting Pensacola and loving it, I have no connection to it, let alone conflict of interest. If you're telling me I should run all edits past you, I can. I just don't understand. Thanks, Mary Mary E Eberle (talk) 21:49, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

@Mary E Eberle: My apologies, then. There was a problem with your edit in that Wikipedia has a content guideline (Wikipedia:External_links), which states "Wikipedia articles may include links to web pages outside Wikipedia (external links), but they should not normally be placed in the body of an article." I therefore reverted your edit. I do hope that you will continue to edit Wikipedia. If you have any concerns or questions, please ask me for help. - Donald Albury 22:06, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

User talk:Bertie Patty Watson

Hello, Donald. I noticed some fishiness at User talk:Bertie Patty Watson. Should something be done? Flooded with them hundreds 14:38, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Wierd. I blocked the user for "not (being) here to build an enyclopedia". - Donald Albury 14:59, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Lamp

Can you get the article out of draft?--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 00:58, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

I don't work in draft space, but if I did, I would tell you to find independent reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the subject of your article. Do that and then get approval of one of the editors that does work with draft articles. - Donald Albury 01:06, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 01:07, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

Thanks

Thanks for finding a reference for the Bonita Springs sister cities. I wonder if the addition would have been as effective without the 'it only took 30 seconds' edit summary? Niteshift36 (talk) 16:23, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Lake Okeechobee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Cutler Bay

You recently reverted my edit to Cutler Bay, Florida and said it had incorrect information. The new mayor and council member is listed both here and here on the town's official web site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.218.117.234 (talk) 16:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

I reverted you for inserting incorrect information in the "Surrounding areas" section, which involved the three previous edits you had made to the article, see [3]. I missed that your first edit had been in elected officials. Unfortunately, when I selected "revert", it reverted all of the consecutive edits you had made, no matter how many there were. - Donald Albury 20:33, 31 December 2018 (UTC)