Doranchak

--Captain538 14:38, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Barkmarket.vegas.throat.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Barkmarket.vegas.throat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:43, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

340

Hi Doranchak, on your posted page, you mean 340 and not 346 in the next to last sentence before the ciphers, right? Your sentence "Additionally, Corey claims that the Caesar shift sequence "346" has a special significance at the very beginning of the decoded cipher text.

Unless I'm missing something, I believe that I'm pointing out a typo that you may want to correct. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 01:28, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

No, I meant "346". He attributes special significance to this sequence in this excerpt from a personal correspondence: "346 repeats itself 3 times right at the outset before it switches back to 343 and takes on another pattern." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.163.23.194 (talk) 02:12, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I thought this was based on the claim of significance of 340 in the original article. I didn't realize there was correspondence.

Good work, btw. It will be interesting to see if that paper publishes a retraction or followup.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 02:24, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

November 2017

Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Zodiac Killer in popular culture, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks - I re-added it with citations. Let me know if they are not sufficient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doranchak (talk • contribs) 19:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Looks good! Thanks. TJRC (talk) 22:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Tamam Shud case

Hi Doranchak, have you tried your hand at the potential cipher in the Tamam Shud case? I would be interested in your thoughts on that one. Cheers,
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 22:45, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Btw, you can notify me in your post by using {{ping|Berean Hunter}} or one of the other variants described in WP:PING.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)