Dorintosh

Nonconstructive?

Please explain this edit and your deletion of my talk page comment. It does not make any sense to me. You need a valid reason to delete someone's talk page comment. See WP:TPO. --2604:2000:E010:1100:A1C9:3376:1282:532D (talk) 18:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

And this edit

Please explain this edit. You deleted appropriate material. And you changed an edit that conformed with MOS (the lower case l). Worse - you did this using Huggle tools - as though it was vandalism. Please explain. --2604:2000:E010:1100:A1C9:3376:1282:532D (talk) 19:01, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

• Study the English language and maybe then you'll understand. Dorintosh (talk) 19:04, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

• • User:Petrb @Petrb: or User:Ron Ritzman @Ron Ritzman: - Maybe you can help here? This is where Mr. Dorintosh responded (above). --2604:2000:E010:1100:A1C9:3376:1282:532D (talk) 19:08, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

@Dorintosh, I am "just" a regular editor. In my opinion, the IP has asked a genuinely polite question why you reverted the case change in the letter "L", (*"Minor League" >>> back to "Minor league"). I have no idea which is correct. But I can argue with sources why blue spruce is blue spruce but Barred Owl is Barred Owl. If you are not willing to answer them in a constructive collaborative way over such a simple matter, I wonder if someone erred when they gave you vandalism fighting tools? Please demonsrate that you can use them constructively by answering this users question. If you keep refusing, then I'd say the IP should read the text at WP:DISRUPTSIGNS. there, you will see that one indicator of disruption is a refusal to answer simple direct questions of this sort. Thanks for working to clear this up. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 22:59, 3 February 2019 (UTC) PS Please respond to the question at the article talk page in this thread, which you deleted and the IP restored before I managed to restore it myself. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 23:04, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)