Dorothysantos

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Dorothysantos, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Gobōnobō + c 11:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

You're invited! WikiWomen's Edit-a-thon at the University of California, Berkeley

Saturday, April 5 - WikiWomen's Edit-a-thon at the University of California, Berkeley - You are invited!

The University of California, Berkeley's Berkeley Center for New Media is hosting our first edit-a-thon, facilitated by WikiWoman Sarah Stierch, on April 5! This event, focused on engaging women to contribute to Wikipedia, will feature a brief Wikipedia policy and tips overview, followed by a fast-paced energetic edit-a-thon. Everyone is welcome to attend. Please bring your laptop and be prepared to edit about women and women's history! The event is April 5, from 1-5 PM, at the Berkeley Center for New Media Commons at Moffitt Library. You must RSVP here - see you there! SarahStierch (talk) 00:02, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

San Francisco ArtandFeminism meetup thanks

Thank you for participating in Wikipedia:Meetup/San Francisco/ArtandFeminism 2015 yesterday! It was a wonderful edit-a-thon, with at least 45 articles created and expanded - here are some photos. If you'd be interested in attending future editing meetups in the San Francisco Bay Area, you can subscribe to the Wikimedia-SF mailing list for news via email, and you can also add yourself to Wikipedia:Meetup/San Francisco/Invite to get invited to future meetups via a message on your talk page. Dreamyshade (talk) 00:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

2016 SF Art And Feminism Wikipedia Editathon @ CCA

You are invited! - Saturday, March 5 - Wikipedia:Meetup/San Francisco/ArtandFeminism 2016			Please join us at the California College of the Arts' Simpson Library on Saturday March 6, 2016, for an event aimed at collaboratively expanding Wikipedia articles covering Art and Feminism, and the biographies of women artists! --Circa73 (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jenifer K. Wofford (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Dorothysantos/Jenifer K. Wofford and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:50, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Heather Dewey-Hagborg. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Quis separabit? 23:38, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Noted. Please understand that the changes were inadvertant and I hit "undo" as soon as I realized what I had done. I didn't mean any distress and I have been researching Dewey-Hagborg's work for years now. I was using her page as a stellar example of what an artist page ought to look like. Again, I didn't mean to upset you or any other editor and tried my best to make certain it was in the state I found the page. I also, genuinely, thought I was in my Sandbox when I made those changes. I am way more cautious since Sunday to make certain I am ALWAYS in my Sandbox when experimenting or creating new articles. I know you are doing your job. Clearly, you are very good at it. :) Quis separabit? Dorothysantos (talk) 08:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Dorothysantos/Jenifer K. Wofford

Hello, Dorothysantos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jenifer K. Wofford".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 18:35, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Weston Teruya) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Weston Teruya.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

The article needs more citations to secondary sources in order to demonstrate that it meets the general notability guideline

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:33, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Weston Teruya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Weston Teruya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weston Teruya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:55, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Michele Carlson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michele Carlson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Carlson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:04, 21 August 2019 (UTC)