User talk:Dougie WII/Archives/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Dougie WII. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 07:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Ohio Central Railroad
There was absolutely no reason to delete the Ohio Central Railroad's new article. I have no affiliation with the company--I am just trying to get an article started for a growing short-line hauler in Ohio. If you have a problem with them having an article, perhaps you should also delete the entries from Norfolk Southern and CSX--two other railroads that operate in Ohio. --Captadam 14:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Shri Ram Chandra of Shahjahanpur
There is no reason to delete this new article. This man has done some work and is important in India and know in over 90 countries. You seem to have problems with other articles also. Maybe the problem is YOU!! --Roicharlemagne 23:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Endianessmap
I have added this part in the Endianess article and it was removed. I added it to the talkes page and references it. Then it was removed because someone sayed there should be no link to the talk page. Then I allocated this article. It was previously removed because there was a copy in the talks page. So I removed the talkes page copy and allocated the article again. One cannot understand the Endianessmap.jpg diagram without an explanation to it. It is not a howto. It explaines the was endianess work. You should not just delete an article by looking at the structure but also try to read and understand what is the content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eiselekd (talk • contribs) 17:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
It's really disturbing. Who decides which article is deleted or not? Anyone can just state some comment and submit a deletion? Could you consider to remove your deletein suggestion? The normal path of coming to this article is: Endianess->Endianessmap. The people that now start to comment the deletion suggestion seem not to notice the intent of the article. I dought also that they ever read Endianess and the example of Endianessmap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eiselekd (talk • contribs) 18:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- Deletions in deletion discussions are decided by an administrator after the discussion is open for 5 days. During that time, anyone may comment on whether or not the article meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and is appropriate for inclusion. It shouldn't be "disturbing". Leebo T/C 18:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- Moved the article to Image:Endianessmap.jpg. Thank you to Leebo's suggestion to move it there.
I think there shouldnt be anyone that comes up with that the text at Image:Endianessmap.jpg is inapropriate and file it for deletion. Eiselekd 18:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- Cool, that sounds like a good place for it. Dougie WII 18:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Neurosphere (film)
I don't want to be disrepectful to wikipedia's rules on advertising. I was creating article about a film that is expected to be released. I will retieve reliable references and sources outside of the film's website. I just recently created this page. Thanks for the heads up! SluggerBugger 06:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Good work
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks for all the CSD work. Tim Vickers 19:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC) |
CSD deletion
Please don't nominate books, schools and so on with CSD A7. Charles Matthews 07:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
You are making far too many speedy deletion nominations that are inappropriate. And you must never tag articles for deletion as minor edit. Charles Matthews 07:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- It's not me, I'm using TWINKLE and it marks speedy deletions as minor for everyone apparently. Dougie WII 08:19, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
بلال الطيب
Thanks for your help with this article in terms of referring it to Google Translation for proof of non-notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Does not appear to be vandalizing. A gentle introduction to the notability policy may be more helpful. If he then persists a block may be in order. JoshuaZ 01:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)