Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Dparsonsnz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for User:Dparsonsnz/mLearn. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Ed!(talk) 03:05, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2012

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Massey University, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:41, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

The article International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent refs. No sign of coming close to meeting WP:GNG. Created by editor with a similar name to the editor of the journal.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:45, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Saving International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning

edit

I notice that you've added some more content to International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning. None of this content is significant, indepth and independent, which is what is needed to meet the WP:GNG. I would encourage you to read WP:42. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:22, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's not clear to me what the further expectations are for a page that describes a peer reviewed academic journal. IJMBL has a very similar page to many other journals. The links suggested above do not sensibly apply to this type of page. I would appreciate being directed to a suggested exemplar. 130.123.104.22 (talk) 03:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
See Nature (journal) for example. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of MLearn

edit
 

The article MLearn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources, no indication of notability. Article on organization has been deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 18:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of MLearn for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MLearn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MLearn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 08:34, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've added a third party reference but now I'm leaving this for other members of the international association for mobile learning (who's page someone already deleted) to argue this one. Dparsonsnz (talk) 21:56, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of IADIS Mobile Learning

edit
 

The article IADIS Mobile Learning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 15:10, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I added this page as a service to public information based on my leading role in the academic mobile learning community but have no interest in attempting to change it to meet other criteria. I will, however, inform the academics who run this conference series. Dparsonsnz (talk) 22:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2014

edit

  Hello, Dparsonsnz. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article MLearn, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please note that I have no direct connection with the IADIS Mobile Learning conference. I attended once and have acted as a reviewer but am not and have never been an organizer 130.123.104.22 (talk) 23:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:21, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of IADIS Mobile Learning for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IADIS Mobile Learning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IADIS Mobile Learning until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 02:00, Monday, December 2, 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 20:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 21:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply