Dpmath
Dolores Park Image
editThe image of Dolores Park you have is great - I would love to find out more about where it came from and who owns it so that I could look into usage of it. Do you mind contacting me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Astreibe (talk • contribs) 00:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Astreibe (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC).
Hi there - I would still love to find out about the image - please contact me if possible. Thanks. Astreibe (talk) 22:20, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Leather
editThanks for the clean up on Leather page. I hope to see this take a step towards reality in the near future. Though I do somehow like the idea of roving gangs of gay WWII vets, stocked with war surplus goods looking for a lifestyle to found. Jacksinterweb (talk) 01:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- You might want to give the Leather Archives and Museum a look see if you are going to dive into the Leather Article. I am not sure how useful it is as a source, but perhaps something can be culled from the site.
- You'll find that the movie "Cruising" figures into most gay non vanilla articles on WP (and I may be wrong, but I think the Harvey Girls is referenced on everything else gay).
- http://www.leatherarchives.org/ Hope this helps. Jacksinterweb (talk) 02:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Regarding your edits to Prince Albert
editHello, thanks for attending to that paragraph....you did a nice job with some fairly twisted grammar.
I'm not sure about the claim that the urine dribbling is a problem only when using a urinal. From what I can tell it's an issue whenever standing up to urinate. Though it's possible that since one *must* stand up at the urinal, this is what you mean by the remark? Perhaps it can be clarified.
Cheers. Dpmath (talk) 19:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. I am not uptight about English grammar, but I think it's nice when it's right and it makes things so much easier to understand! As to the dribbling -- what I was getting at was that it's a problem whenever urinating, it's a question of whether said dribbles are 'caught' or not in my experience. Standing at an ordinary lavatory will have much the same problems as stading at a urinal -- worse I would have thought -- and of course sitting on a lavatory doesn't preclude one from urine spraying farther than one wouth like it to :-s
I hope this answers your question. Showjumpersam (talk) 20:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Heavy metal fashion
editNoticed you had worked to improve this article back in December. It has been nominated for deletion. Thought you may have an opinion. 156.34.223.41 (talk) 21:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Vote for picture placement on prince albert piercing Numpty454 (talk) 09:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
edita
Your submission at Articles for creation
editThe article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Jamesx12345 (talk) 18:51, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for July 23
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Merrill College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Santa Cruz Zen Center for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santa Cruz Zen Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santa Cruz Zen Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:19, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)