Dpugh500
November 2023
edit
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:18, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
January 2024
edit Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kath Soucie, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization Talk 22:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- I fell sorry for you but her birth name is Katherine Elaine Soucie. Dpugh500 (talk) 22:11, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Vernee Watson-Johnson, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization Talk 22:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
edit Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kath Soucie, you may be blocked from editing. Please see WP:BURDEN Waxworker (talk) 22:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Drmies (talk) 14:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC) |
- Bbb23! You may remember this editor, who promised to never return, or whatever that is. Drmies (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Drmies: You think I remember editors I blocked in 2022? Ha! I barely remember editors I blocked yesterday. I am surprised that Dpugh500 hasn't been indeffed before now for disruption. Were you planning on tagging the accounts? I've became a born-again tagger since the apocalypse.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- You have the memory of an elephant, so yes. I don't know--if you want to tag them, go for it, but it's not CU confirmed and I found no others. Drmies (talk) 15:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Unsupported flattery will get you nowhere! Tagged as suspected (never thought it was confirmed, but I'm glad you looked for others).--Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- You have the memory of an elephant, so yes. I don't know--if you want to tag them, go for it, but it's not CU confirmed and I found no others. Drmies (talk) 15:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Drmies: You think I remember editors I blocked in 2022? Ha! I barely remember editors I blocked yesterday. I am surprised that Dpugh500 hasn't been indeffed before now for disruption. Were you planning on tagging the accounts? I've became a born-again tagger since the apocalypse.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Dpugh, let me just add that the edits that you made are, well, how do I say this nicely--they're useless and wrong. This makes no sense, this is just plain wrong, this sounds like it's based on internet chatter, etc. Drmies (talk) 14:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)