DrBeck007

January 2024

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Hiragana, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

arigato! Thanks! Sometimes I work late at night and do not think. I have explained my changes now. It is important today, that we understand the new research going on. For me the biggest surprise was in the field of Japanese architecture (2023). The question of chō versus yomachi in the Jobo city block and the English misunderstanding. Even here, in a remote part of Japanese study do we find the need to go back to origins of hiragana, and what was Tale of Genji written in. 174.214.16.81 (talk) 11:35, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Hiragana. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

You should apply that standard to yourself, before referencing Yookuso, p13. That source DOES NOT EXIST. THEREFOR, there is NO EVIDENCE FOR A 5th Century creation of Hiragana in your article. 174.214.16.85 (talk) 00:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Hiragana shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 01:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)