User talk:DrMichaelWright/Mijdrecht

Evaluations

edit

1/24/2018 Evaluation by DrMichaelWright

edit

DrMichaelWright (talk) 01:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Points: 29.5/40
  • Grade: 74%

Spelling/Grammar

edit

Meets Expectations

Language

edit

Meets Expectations

Organization

edit

Does not meet standard. There are numerous short paragraphs, representing unrelated snippets of information.

Coding

edit

Perfect

Validity

edit

Does not meet standard. Example: "There is no police or doctor in the weekends" is probably not true, nor is this information that has been cited.

Completion

edit

Does not meet standard. This page is just a stub and does not include all of the elements that one should expect of a page for a village of this type.

Relevance

edit

Does not meet standard. There are numerous bits of information that are of questionable relevance in light of a lot of more pertinent information that could be included, such as information about the municipal government or a list of neighborhoods.

Sources

edit

Does not meet standard. There are numerous items on this page that are not sourced, missing both citations and references. The two AJOC Festival sources seem to be semi-official sources, written by the organization itself on a semi-public website.

This was a pre-existing sentence without any citation. A low-quality citation is better than no citation at all.DrMichaelWright (talk) 05:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Citations

edit

Meets Expectations While more sentences could be sourced (see above), the citation style is in good order, with notes appropriately placed (after the periods of sentences, and grouped where a reference is cited in multiple locations (e.g. Note 1/Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek)).

References

edit

Nearly meets standard. While the reference style is in good order, the style has been changed from the original to APA. The Wikipedia rules require reference styles to be maintained from the original.