Dr Gonzo5269

The Good Dr.

Hello, my name is Dr. Gonzo. My mission statement is to contribute to articles in a positive and factual manner. It is my philosophy to tell a story in a factual manner with as much detail as possible and let the reader make up their mind and form their own opinions. I have no patience for editors who do not follow WP:NPOV and WP:AGF. I am not a negative person, nor do I dwell on the negative, nor do I like negative people, nor do I like people who dwell on the negative. Please, feel free to leave me a message. If you are a believer in the two policies I have mentioned, then we may be friends. If you are not or you don't adhere to them, then we can not be friends. I look forward to working with everyone!!!--Dr Gonzo5269 (talk) 02:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

The difference

is what has the editors' attention. The article has a lot of people's attention so in that regard, there's a bunch more critiques of sourcing and what's neutral and what is not. For example, if you get underneath the radar of what people monitor, past the recent changes, new page patrollers, and others you can pretty much add whatever you want; until someone notices. There are a lot of people 'noticing' the page now and its content; popular pages have that and some, like Barrack Obama have slews of people monitoring, criticizing and editing the article. It's in its nature. The reasoning of why other pages can do X but you can't on Y is due to the fact that Y has more active/knowledgable editors watching/critiquing what's put into the article, other than X which no one seems to know about/care about. Tutelary (talk) 03:06, 7 July 2014 (UTC)