Dr Jarse

August 2018

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. Orange Mike | Talk 20:18, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Dr Jarse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Dr Jarse (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

The username I was blocked for is, believe it or not my real name. I'm willing to change my username if it's too hot to handle. Editing wikipedia is a new hobby of mine that I do in downtime at work. I have never vandalized the site and I think this is a silly reason to ban a perfectly well behaved user Dr Hugh Jarse (talk) 05:19, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Well, whether I believe it or not isn't really relevant, as the block is only based on your username. As your chosen new name seems fine, I have renamed and unblocked. Welcome back. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Jeremy Vine (TV show) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeremy Vine (TV show) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Vine (TV show) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Launchballer 15:06, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Nooo... Adam Nelson 06 (talk) 16:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Undoing vandalism

When undoing vandalism, please be alert to the possibility that there might be more than one edit to revert, e.g. on Pewter. You may want to investigate using Wikipedia:Twinkle to help you fight vandalism. It makes it easy to revert an article to a good version. Thanks for your contributions. TwoTwoHello (talk) 11:36, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Beggali Jarse

SINGH! Capati tak laku. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.13.195.12 (talk) 05:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dr Jarse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dr Jarse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)