February 2015

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Mark Regnerus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Mark Regnerus

edit

If you want to see that change, take it to the talk page and achieve consensus before reinserting it. --Nat Gertler (talk) 21:35, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic "Stale promotional COI edits at orphan article". Thank you. —Nøkkenbuer (talkcontribs) 00:43, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pulsed Arc Nanoparticle Synthesis (October 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:59, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Dr thermano! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:59, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pulsed Arc Nanoparticle Synthesis (October 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ldm1954 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ldm1954 (talk) 14:47, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Pulsed Arc Nanoparticle Synthesis

edit

  Hello, Dr thermano. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pulsed Arc Nanoparticle Synthesis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply