Drlammel
Welcome
edit
September 2009editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pinhão, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not change a perfectly acceptable disambiguation page into something completely different. If you have enough content for a new page then it must be created from fresh. In your case you would have to call the new page something like "Pinhão (seed)", and you could add a link to it at the "Pinhão" disambiguation page. Ronhjones (Talk) 19:52, 4 September 2009 (UTC) PinhãoeditDear Drlammel, please read Starting a new page and especially Your first article. Note you cannot create a page until your account is autoconfirmed - 4 days old and 10 edits. I have moved your content to a user sandbox for you - you will find it at User:Drlammel/Sandbox. I suggest you edit it there until you think it is good enough to move to the main space. I could have put it there myself - but at present it is not good enough to stay - some editor would rapidly put a Speedy Delete tag on it. You need to show that the subject is notable and have suitable in-line references to back it up. I've added a reflist template (under the References heading), so when you add an in-line reference it will show up in the correct space. Once the article is good, then click on this red link Pinhão (Brazilian Pine seed) and (if you are autoconfirmed) you will be given an option to start the article, click that, and you will get an edit box. You can then cut and paste (without the sandbox template at the top of the page) from your sandbox. Hope that helps you create a good article. Ronhjones (Talk) 20:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC) Replaceable fair use File:Erva_mate_market.jpgeditThanks for uploading File:Erva_mate_market.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 02:02, 1 August 2011 (UTC) File source problem with File:Erva_Mate_Plantation_Brasil.jpgeditThank you for uploading File:Erva_Mate_Plantation_Brasil.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 02:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC) Replaceable fair use File:Cuias_de_chimarrao.jpgeditThanks for uploading File:Cuias_de_chimarrao.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 02:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Erva Mate Plantation Brasil.jpgeditThanks for uploading File:Erva Mate Plantation Brasil.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 00:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC) |