edit war warning

edit
 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Valsartan/sacubitril. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Jytdog (talk) 21:34, 3 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


Sock puppets

edit

It appears that you shifted over to editing through IP addresses, as they are continuing your vandalism:

not a great way to start out in WP. See WP:SOCK. Jytdog (talk) 21:48, 3 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

talk!

edit

I opened a section on Talk, just for you. Talk:Valsartan/sacubitril#Complex Jytdog (talk) 21:34, 3 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Polmacoxib

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Polmacoxib, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.medkoo.com/Anticancer-trials/Polmacoxib.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:21, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply