Druge

Please stop tagging articles as nonsense when they clearly do not meet the requirements of WP:CSD#G1. Thank-you. —  Tivedshambo  _(t|c) 11:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Please read WP:CSD before tagging articles with speedy deletes. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 11:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Only I fully understand the policy! Druge (talk) 11:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 11:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

How fucking dare you accuse me of vandalism. Druge (talk) 11:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Druge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Someone more intelligent than yourselves comes along and he gets blocked. This is just great. WORSHIP MY AWESOME GRASP OF THE NOTABILITY POLICY

Decline reason:

Incivility and totally unconstructive additions. This block is preventative and within policy. — Pedro :  Chat  11:25, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Druge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Incivility? Is it unPClike to declare you are more intelligent than another? If thats the case, then I am incivil. I hold PHD degrees in Molecular Biology, Modern French History, Medieval Papal history, Hydrological engineering, Education, being stuck up, the Wikipedia Notability policy. I believe I am superior in every fashion to every one of you, mainly because of my amazing grasp of the Wikipedia notability policy (Which really only requires one admin to delete an article he doesn't agree with) and you people are OK with this. Get a girlfriend, or a life, or both, because I've really enjoyed my little trolling spree here. See you this tomorrow folks!

Decline reason:

Repeated vandalism, and repeated personal attacks, even in this unblock request make it clear that you are not interested in constructive contribution to the encyclopedia and are here simply to wind people up. Block extended to indefinite

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Based on your stated intention to continue disrupting Wikipedia, I've changed your block to an indefinite one. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)