Dscheinder

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dscheinder! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rubbish computer and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 11:45, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Days of Year Pages

Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. Toddst1 (talk) 13:33, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Dscheinder, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dscheinder! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Recent edit to Hybrid cryptosystem

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hybrid cryptosystem, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Cyclotomic polynomial

Hello.
[1]: either “magnitude up to 532” or “up to ±532”. Choose something that you like more. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:00, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

NewHope moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, NewHope, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 08:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

I've tried to clean up the issues noted and moved it back to article space. See Talk:NewHope.--agr (talk) 16:35, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NewHope (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NewHope and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NewHope, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:55, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CECPQ2

The article CECPQ2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There doesn't appear to be any coverage in independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG, possibly just WP:TOOSOON

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:17, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of CECPQ2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CECPQ2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CECPQ2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:02, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve ALTS

Hello, Dscheinder,

Thank you for creating ALTS.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article needs additional citations to sources that are independent of Google. While sources #2 and #6 are not published by Google, they also do not appear to cover ALTS at all and thus don't make much of a difference.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)