DtemiankaHT
- I read your note on my talkpage, welcome to Wikipedia, I'll pop a welcome note with some useful links on your talkpage. The easiest way for you to create your article is to click on the red link of your father's name that you mention you have have inserted into the Curtis Inst article. This will bring up the edit page for the prospective article. You can then cut and paste the info that you have written. Then select 'preview' so that you can see that the article looks how you wish it to look and then when you are happy click 'save'. It will then all depend on how well referenced the article is and how notable your father is. With regard to photo uploading you can either upload by clicking on 'upload file' in the left hand menu box called 'toolbox' or you can upload to Wikepedia Commons. In either case just follow the instructions, if you have any difficulty do come back to me.
Welcome
edit
|
- Hi, go to Wikipedia:Upload and click on the internal links. You'll see that commons is a sister project for images that can then be used on all Wiki projects. If you are trying to upload a photo taken by yourself then you are the copyright holder and can choose an appropriate license.Paste Let’s have a chat. 16:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Paganini Quartet.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Paganini Quartet.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:PQ with Segovia & Castelnuovo-Tedesco.jpg
editThank you for uploading File:PQ with Segovia & Castelnuovo-Tedesco.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Please review my revised copyright information for Fair Use of this photograph, before deleting. Thank you! DtemiankaHT (talk) 16:35, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:PQ AT CARDS.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:PQ AT CARDS.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
- Please review my revised copyright information for Fair Use of this personal photograph, before deleting. Thank you!DtemiankaHT (talk) 16:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 19:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:The Paganini Strads.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:The Paganini Strads.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:08, 7 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 19:08, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:PQ AT CARDS.jpg
editThanks for uploading or contributing to File:PQ AT CARDS.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:33, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Please review my revised copyright information for Fair Use of this personal photograph, before deleting. Thank you!DtemiankaHT (talk)
File source problem with File:Paganini Quartet.jpg
editThank you for uploading File:Paganini Quartet.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:The Original Paganini Quartet.jpg
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Original Paganini Quartet.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello Magog, I am belatedly responding to your comments on this photo. I was surprised and disappointed to see that it has been deleted, as I thought we had resolved this issue. The copyright status is very similar to that for "The PQ Relaxing" on this page. I will make another attempt to submit satisfactory copyright info, and will appreciate any additional direction you can provide. Thanks much. DtemiankaHT (talk) 20:41, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Original Paganini Quartet.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:The Original Paganini Quartet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:PQ EARLY 4.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:PQ EARLY 4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
FFD Notification
editPlease see Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_March_9#Photos_from_Paganini_Quartet. I have two concerns about these images. One is that there are excessively many images for the article. The second is that we don't normally accept images from the copyright holder under restrictive terms - if the estate that you are the executor for would like to release the images under the terms of an acceptable free content license, that would be fine, but when images licensed for use on "Wikipedia only" were banned six years ago, this is the type of thing it was targeting. --B (talk) 02:56, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Response re photos
editHello B, I am of course disappointed that the photos in my article on the Paganini Quartet have been deleted. As you can see I had made several changes over nearly two years in an attempt to meet Wikipedia's requirements regarding copyright protection. I must admit that the guidelines are complex and bewildering... through no fault of yours, I realize.
I have acted in good faith, and done my level best to be open and honest as to the provenance, or lack of it, for these images. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the persons depicted and their photographers are either dead or, if still active, are unknown and impossible to contact.
I would be most grateful for more specific direction. I have full authority to act on behalf of the Henri Temianka Estate, in which the photos reside, and would be quite willing to release the photos for Free Use, as suggested. I believe the photos add substantially to the shape and appeal of the article. Many thanks in advance for your guidance. DtemiankaHT (talk) 22:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:PQ LOC PROGRAM 1.jpg
editThank you for uploading File:PQ LOC PROGRAM 1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 00:50, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Citing reliable sources
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Nuclear-powered icebreaker, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Brianhe (talk) 14:53, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 7
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henri Temianka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Newman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, DtemiankaHT. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, DtemiankaHT. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, DtemiankaHT. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, DtemiankaHT. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Creation of Paganini quartet
editDear Sir, After reading this interesting article, I am surprised to learn that Henri Temianka created the Paganini quartet. However, it is specified there that it was Robert Maas who obtained the patronage of Mrs. Anna Clark and that it was also Robert Maas who found the musical instruments at her luthier, which Mrs. Clark immediately purchased.
I also have various documents (letters from Henri Temianka, Robert Courte and Gustave Rossels) in which it appears that it was Robert Maas who founded the quartet:
• Henri Temianka writes that Robert created the quartet and gave it everything (letters of January 2 and October 3, 1949); • Robert Courte does the same (letter of August 20, 1948); • Gustave Rossels thanks Robert Maas almost 20 years after his death for giving him the opportunity to come to America (letter of January 22, 1966); • Robert Courte also thanks him for offering to join the quartet (letter of January 28, 1946). A concert program dated November 13, 1953 further indicates that "the Paganini Quartet was created at the beginning of 1946, on the initiative of the great cellist Robert Maas ...". These archives will be transferred in the course of 2021 to the Robert Maas Fund, created at the Royal Library of Belgium. Everything therefore indicates that Robert Maas is at the origin of the creation of the Paganini (obtaining a sponsorship, research of instruments and musicians), which does not detract from the importance of Henri Temianka on whom the choice is is also arrested in view of his recognized qualities. Mrs. Clark’s strong moral and financial support was also of paramount importance.
In order not to erase this contribution, I would like the text to be changed and now mention that the quartet was created at the initiative of Robert Maas. Thank you in advance. --Skyetciel (talk) 16:57, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
REPLY: Hello Skyetciel, Thank you for your comments. You make a very interesting point. I invite you to read, if you have not already, pages 115 through 118 of my father's book "Facing the Music," where he discusses this important history. (If you do not have a copy of the book, and would like to share your mailing address, I will be happy to mail you a copy with my compliments.) Please allow me at least a few days to consider this matter and do some additional research, including a review of original letters from that period. I am open to editing the language in the Wikipedia articles in a manner agreeable to us both. Maestro Maas would undoubtedly have received more recognition had he not tragically passed away so soon. You may also wish to look at the link to the Henri Temianka Archives, located at Chapman University in Orange, California. My wife and I established the Archives some years ago, and it houses more than 3000 letters, photographs and other memorabilia. See https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/temianka/ Regards,
DT
Creation of Paganini quartet
editHello DtemiankaHT I have just seen that the page devoted to the biography of Henri Temianka has recently been modified regarding the creation of the Paganini quartet.
However, I am surprised to read that the quartet is the result of a co-foundation. May I ask you what the sources were for this correction?
I have consulted numerous documents from my family archives which state that the quartet was founded by Robert Maas, alone, with the financial support of Mrs. Clark.
According to these documents, it was Robert Maas who obtained the support of the latter, found the four instruments at his luthier, and contacted two of his friends and fellow musicians Robert Courte and Gustave Rosseels. The only thing that I don’t know is the exact circumstance in which Henri Temianka was also approached because I have no document on this subject. I know of course that Henri Temianka was an excellent performer and that offering him to join the new quartet was no surprise but I do not know when and how he and Robert Maas first came into contact about the creation of the quartet.
Among all the documents establishing the identity of the founder of the quartet (among others letters from third parties and a concert program), the most important one is the contract concluded between Robert Maas and Anna Clark on February 14, 1946 (and its amendment of December 6, 1947) which undoubtedly specifies that Anna Clark sponsors Robert Maas to organize and develop the future Paganini quartet, as well as to look for three other people, one of whom will be Henri Temianka (it is specified in the contract).
Unless you have documents as convincing as mine and which clearly establish the reality of a co-foundation, it would be useful to modify the paragraph on the creation of the Paganini to include the name of Robert Maas only.
About the creation of this quartet, you can consult the biography of Robert Maas in Wikipedia through: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Maas.
The family archives are transferred to the Robert Maas Fund of the Music Section of the Royal Library of Belgium. I have kept scanned copies of the documents mentioned above. If you wish, I can communicate them to you if you send me your e-mail.
If you also wish to send documents or contact me directly, here is my email : colin.francoise@gmail.com.
Thank you very much for your attention. Skyetciel (talk) 14:51, 17 April 2021 (UTC)