Dtravis30
Image tagging for File:Adonis Creed.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Adonis Creed.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
January 2016
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Penny (The Big Bang Theory). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 22:37, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- Your edits to Penny (The Big Bang Theory) have now been reverted by multiple editors.[1][2][3][4] Please stop changing the article has you have been doing and discuss your proposed changes on the article's talk page. --AussieLegend (✉) 22:43, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 27
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Schulz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
August 2016
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Justice League (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DarkKnight2149 21:16, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
February 2017
editHello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Bill Paxton, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please read the edit summaries of the reverts. - Mlpearc (open channel) 01:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
March 2017
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Power Rangers (film). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Emir of Wikipedia. An edit that you recently made to User:Emir of Wikipedia seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 26
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Power Rangers (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alpha 5. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Talkback
editMessage added 17:58, 26 March 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
March 2017
editHello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Power Rangers (film)#Plot edit war, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons you might want to). You said at Talk:Power Rangers (film)#Plot edit war, the vast majority of films on this site have a complete synopsis (examples include The Dark Knight Rises, Batman (film) etc. , and this one should be no different. If you want to be a stickler for rules, then go through and change the plot section of every film on this site.
Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Power_Rangers_(film).
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you would like to go against WP:FILMPLOT then please get a consensus from other editors. Brojam (talk) 21:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
editHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dtravis30 reported by User:Emir of Wikipedia (Result: ). Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:52, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Dtravis30. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article The Brilliant Idiots has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not pass WP:GNG. The current sources are examples of WP:YOUTUBE, WP:INTERVIEW, WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS, and WP:SPS. Searching for other sources yields only trivial mentions.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TipsyElephant (talk) 16:28, 25 November 2021 (UTC)