User talk:Duartecaldas
Add topic| This is Duartecaldas's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: 3 Comma Capital (April 28)
[edit]
- Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
- Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
- promotional language: see Words to watch;
- personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
- informal language.
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.
If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.Next steps
- Edit Draft:3 Comma Capital to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
 |
Hello, Duartecaldas!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 17:59, 28 April 2026 (UTC) |
- Dear Bobby,
- Thank you for your kind attention in reviewing the article and for the heads up on the disclosure requirement. I have now proceeded with the disclosure using the template you kindly sent me
in my User page. Hope it is correct now.
Duartecaldas, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that he has been paid by 3CommaCapital for his contributions to Wikipedia. - I was a bit surprised on your mention that the article reads like an advertisement. It shouldn't. All the claims are true and factual as I have tried to link evidence, citations, etc from reliable sources like Expresso, Jornal Económico, Jornal de Negócios and also IMI Daily, Portugal Financial Regulator Webpage, Euronext Securities webpage to the claims that are made in the article. These are not tabloids. These are some of the best newspapers in Portugal, specialized in Financial and Economy.
- Nevertheless I will try and update the article using the "Words to watch" page you kindly sent me and will try to improve the article as best as I can.
- Thank you again for your kind attention,
- Duarte Duartecaldas (talk) 10:45, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
.svg)
April 2026
[edit]
Hello Duartecaldas. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Duartecaldas. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Duartecaldas|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 17:59, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Dear Bobby,
- In addition, so there is no misunderstandings, the additional edit I have done and asubmitted was AFTER answering your kind message. Hope it is OK, as you requested not to edit further until I had answered you message. Again, thank you so kindly and hope to hear from you soon.
- Best,
- Duarte Duartecaldas (talk) 12:06, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 3 Comma Capital (June 25)
[edit]Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
- promotional language: see Words to watch;
- personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
- informal language.
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.
If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.Next steps
- Edit Draft:3 Comma Capital to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: 3 Comma Capital (June 27)
[edit]- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:3 Comma Capital to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: 3 Comma Capital (August 25)
[edit]
Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.
Next steps
- If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.