Dubiety

Welcome!

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Dubiety! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 331dot (talk) 12:14, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Paid editing

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I see that you declared a conflict of interest- thanks- if you work for them as you say, you must make the stricter paid editing disclosure, a Terms of Use requirement. 331dot (talk) 12:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Would have replied earlier but I wasn't sure if you were a bot:-0! I'm not paid to do this (they don't even know I'm doing this!) but there's a huge gap in disability mobility here. I was determined not to be bullied off by those who just don't care about monitories, but also haven't got a lot of time to donate, so I'll park it and hope someone else takes it up. Dubiety (talk) 12:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

You said on your userpage that you are "currently employed by Wheels for Wellbeing as a cycling instructor"; this counts as "paid editing", which is not limited to specific payments for edits, but includes any paid relationship. 331dot (talk) 13:02, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wheels for Wellbeing (September 6)

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The two sources directly concerning the charity are government documents, which are primary sources and do not establish notability. The other sources are more about the founder of the charity than the charity itself. Any article about this charity must primarily summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the organization, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. "Significant coverage" goes beyond the mere reporting of the activities of the charity, and goes in depth about its significance and influence, without things like interviews with organization personnel or materials from the organization. Please read Your First Article; writing an article is challenging without a conflict of interest, it's even harder with one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wheels for Wellbeing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Dubiety! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Wheels for Wellbeing

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Dubiety. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wheels for Wellbeing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Wheels for Wellbeing

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Dubiety. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wheels for Wellbeing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic