AfC notification: Draft:Lloyd Hamilton filmography has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lloyd Hamilton filmography. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:29, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lloyd Hamilton filmography (September 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusWđŸ¶đŸ¶F (bark ‱ sniff) 14:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, DuckyAgain23! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWđŸ¶đŸ¶F (bark ‱ sniff) 14:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit

  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oatsandcream. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Oatsandcream per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oatsandcream. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
--Blablubbs (talk) 15:11, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply