Dude712

Nomination of ''Thomas and Friends: the Magical Adventures'' for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''Thomas and Friends: the Magical Adventures'' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/''Thomas and Friends: the Magical Adventures'' until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  BarkingFish  21:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Rorshacma (talk) 21:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rorshacma (talk) 21:45, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Thomas and Friends the Magical Railroad Adventures for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas and Friends the Magical Railroad Adventures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas and Friends the Magical Railroad Adventures until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Brown (talk) 22:02, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Shark Tale and Shark Tale 2

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Shark Tale and your creation of Shark Tale 2, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edits had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, or obtained through personal knowledge or unpublished synthesis of previously published material. Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here.

In addition, regarding future films, according to WP:NFF, films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks, since there is no "sure thing" production. In the case of animated films, reliable sources must confirm that the film is clearly out of the pre-production process, meaning that the final animation frames are actively being drawn and/or rendered, and final recordings of voice-overs and music have commenced.

Since you're new to Wikipedia, here are a couple of tips for writing better articles:

• The References section is generally the second-to-last section of a well-developed article. Article text on the article's topic, therefore, should not be placed after it. Information on a film's sequel, for example, is usually included in or right after areas that discuss the film's reception or box office success.
• Never use time references that are vague, subjective, redundant, or that will date eventually, such as "this year", "last year", or "soon", or month-and-day only descriptions like "May 27", since this is not clear to readers. As indicated by WP:DATED, specific time references should be used instead, such as "May 27, 2012". This is because an encyclopedia should not be written with a dated point of view, like a news story.
• Only the first word and proper nouns should be capitalized in section headings. A section, therefore, on a movie's release description, would be written "Movie release description", and not "Movie Release Description". (In any event, such headings in articles on films are usually called "Release" or "Reception", as you can see in the Shark Tale article.)

If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 01:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)