Dude 88888
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Halowsmaster (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Attacks in the article User:Dude 88888
editPlease do not make personal attacks as you did at User:Dude 88888. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 16:34, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Runescape 33
editI luv yer page tunz!!!
Dude 88888
editThank you Runescape 33, but please spell correctly next time.
Speedy deletion of Runescape 33
editPlease refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Runescape 33, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. DanielRigal (talk) 17:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
please do not involve me in your disputes
editYou have left a message on my talk page. If you have matters to speak to me about then speak to me. Do not involve me in other disputes that you may have.
If you need assistance with something place {{helpme}} here and ask your question. Someone will answer your question shortly after that. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Sockpuppet case
editI have delisted the case against you.
It is clear that the assertion that you and Hallowsmaster are the same person is correct, and the mere fact that you tried to lie about that brought you perilously close to being blocked. However, the fact that you haven't used the other account since creating this one is just sufficient to assume good faith in your intentions.
Going forward;
- Don't use multiple accounts.
- Don't try to lie about use of multiple accounts.
- Read our policies about what is and is not acceptable in Wikipedia.
- Don't add content that is contrary to policy.
- Don't vandalise other users pages, and don't attack them.
- Don't run round demanding help from every user you find when somebody does something you don't like.
If you can't stick to this list, you will not be so lucky next time. Mayalld (talk) 10:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
ok
- I'd also suggest you leave Wuhwuzdat (talk · contribs) alone. Your last comments at his talk page not only contradict the conclusion in the sockpuppet case but could be interpreted as harassment. —C.Fred (talk) 19:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- I Do consider that comment to be harrasment. WuhWuzDat 20:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Silk Road, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Silk Road was changed by Dude 88888 (u) (t) deleting 247884 characters on 2010-03-30T12:56:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Talk:Silk Road, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 13:00, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:ArglebargleIV. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 13:12, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ⇦REDVERS⇨ Say NO to Commons bullying 13:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
editHello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:07, 30 March 2010 (UTC)