Duhaaacx
May 2019
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Radford family. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 22:18, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Duhaaacx, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Duhaaacx! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 11 May 2019 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Duhaaacx/sandbox
editPlease do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:Duhaaacx/sandbox, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sheldybett (talk) 06:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
I don’t understand why it was all deleted. It’s my own personal sandbox that allows me to experiment. This was all information for my coursework so whomever deleted it, please reply! Duhaaacx (talk) 15:50, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
November 2019
editHello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Counting On, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- a they/them | argue | contribs 13:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editNovember 2019
editYour recent editing history at Counting On shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nthep (talk) 13:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
How is it fair that I may be blocked from editing when I am reverting edits because the majority of editors on that page agree with, and have also changed the same edits, myself rather than the user that I am in an “edit war” with? Duhaaacx (talk) 17:14, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Duggar Grandchildren
editIf you're going to put them in chronological order, Jill is actually first. Israel and Merideith were born before Spurgeon. 108.170.170.163 (talk) 20:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Israel’s pregnancy announcement was announced in 19KAC, not Counting On Duhaaacx (talk) 21:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editStart a discussion with Duhaaacx
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Duhaaacx. What you say here will be public for others to see.