October 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of programs broadcast by G4 have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Just so you know, I've actually joined Wikipedia back in 2014. It's just that I don't use my old Wikipedia account "Dilly Mackey" anymore. And by the way, you're welcome. --Dylanmc678 (talk) 10:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

August 2022

edit

  Hi Dylanmc678! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:22, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Removing gender information from articles

edit

I've found many articles where you have removed information regarding the gender of a person or persons from Wikipedia without any explanation and without any obvious good reason. Examples:[1][2][3][4][5]. These are just the ones that I found. Please stop doing this; it can be considered a subtle form of vandalism, which can get you blocked from editing. --Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 02:59, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hello. I've reverted some of your edits removing gender-related information, because the removals did not seem constructive. Using gender-neutral language is recommended by the manual of style, but it is not an absolute requirement, and is secondary to the overriding principles of clarity and precision. This means that when sex or gender is specified (or implied beyond a reasonable doubt) in sources, it should not be removed simply to satisfy style.

Context matters as well; if a current or historical government/royal position has only ever been filled by individuals of one sex, and the culture or law makes no allowance for any other and no significant instances of breaking such a trend has been identified in any literature, it does not make sense to describe it in gender neutral terms as the subject is inherently gendered.

I hope this clears it up for you.

--Frogging101 (talk) 21:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Markiplier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023

edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Luka"

edit

Regardless of whether Jillette has actually adopted the name (nickname?) "Luka", you left that sentence pointing to the original source. The original source says nothing about the nickname "Luka". If you introduce a new fact, you need to introduce a new source. I've removed it, pending a new source. DS (talk) 17:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edit on Tom Scott (YouTuber)

edit

Hello, I noticed that on the page Tom Scott (YouTuber) you changed the word "men" to "people" in the early career section about Actual Facebook Graph Searches. I've reverted the edit as the source uses the term "men" and the data was specifically about men and not people. -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 04:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edit on Simon Cowell

edit

Hello, I've reverted your edit on the page Simon Cowell. The show at first was not just finding singers. It was specifically male singers. It appears that you are trying to change terms to be gender-neutral but please make sure that you aren't changing them when they are supposed to be gendered. Thank you -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 04:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edit on Hershey, Pennsylvania

edit

Hello, I've reverted your edit on the page Hershey, Pennsylvania. The source uses the term "boys" not "kids". Changing these terms may cause confusion for the reader. "Kids" implies that there the kids could be of different genders which isn't the case in this context. Feel free to change it back if you find a source that states the school was also for kids of other genders. -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 04:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edit on Dane Boedigheimer

edit

Hello, I've reverted your edit on the page Dane Boedigheimer as it is supposed to be a quote. If you didn't know what a quote is, a quote is an exact wording that somebody has said. Using square brackets does not magically make words able to be changed. By doing so, you are attributing these words to having being said by somebody when they did not say it. Please educate yourself on what a quote is and how it works. Maybe next time you could add a note to clarify that the words were said before the pronoun change instead of misquoting somebody which is something that should never be done. -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 20:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please stop removing information from articles

edit

I have reverted several more of your edits for the same reasons that I mentioned before. Please stop indiscriminately removing words without regard to the meaning of the text you are editing. Frogging101 (talk) 19:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply