Dympies

Dharmendra

Hi, I added this source to support the "Hindu" part you removed here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:12, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Oh I see.. The source talked about Punjabi Hindu credentials of Sunny Deol rather than Dharmendra. Sunny Deol's Hindu identity is itself doubtful as he hasn't self-identified as Hindu; also he has Singh as middle name which is common among Sikhs in Punjab rather than Hindus. Even if we consider the source to be true, we would still need a source for Dharmendra. Dympies (talk) 17:39, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Umm... The opposite is true as far as the given name "Ajay" is concerned, much more a Hindu name than a Sikh one. I agree that a self-identification would be necessary. I used it beacuse of some LTA claiming Dharmendra to be Sikh. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Rajput

I added {{about}} to Rajput to allow users to find the dab page. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Since the disambiguation page has been moved here, this doesn't seem ok. Dympies (talk) 19:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Actually, I think I read somewhere that Rajput should have a hatnote pointing to Rajput (disambiguation), in case someone does create a disambiguation page. Furthermore, people might want to know that a surname page does exist. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Archiving Talk:Islam and secularism

Are there something you can do in order to help me archive Talk:Islam and secularism article in Wikipedia? I tried to use ClueBot III by a user template but it didn't work, do you know any ways in order to successfully archive the talk page by ClueBot III? THX Pineapplethen (talk) 09:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Aniruddhacharya moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aniruddhacharya. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs better quality sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 13:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

@Chaotic Enby: What is your issue with the sources and why do you believe that significant coverage from TV9 Bharatvarsh, Asianet News Network, Network18 Group and more is not enough? Dympies (talk) 14:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi! Sources of the type "Know the net worth of X person!" are often celebrity gossip and not up to Wikipedia's reliability standards. There is also the issue of possible undisclosed paid promotion (see WP:NEWSORGINDIA), which the wording used in the Newstrack source hints at. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

@Chaotic Enby: Added new sources including Outlook India which is absolutely not paid and has provided significant coverage. What do you think now? Dympies (talk) 00:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Aniruddhacharya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aniruddhacharya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aniruddhacharya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring on page Yadav without establishing consensus

Hi Dympies! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.

Even though consensus was build and it was decided to remove the word non elite from the article, you still reverted the same. You should at first build the consensus then you could revert the edit. Brandon42Paul (talk) 05:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Quit India Movement

Please undo your deletion as it is not allowing me do it. Out of all the citations, none is mine - all are well documented and from 1942 British Govt declassified files and 1942 New York Times and 1942 Indian Express. Thanks Sxk125125 (talk) 17:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC)