Dyname42
July 2011
edit
The article Michael P. Nelson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not meet the relevant notability guideline
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sunray (talk) 05:01, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
The article Daniel P. Steel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not meet the notability guideline
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sunray (talk) 05:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
The article Thomas Tomlinson (philosopher) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not meet the relevant notability guideline
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sunray (talk) 05:05, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Advice
edit
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
{{
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
A barnstar for you!
edit
|
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar |
| Hello Dyname42. I noticed your comments on Stewardship, and your request for more content. Brilliant idea.
Would like to stay in touch on the ethic of stewardship and its application across society. ~ Christy Morrell-Stinson, Stellar Impact Foundation, 2012 Charter: "To facilitate the mindset of stewardship and collaboration among people of compassion and influence, for a better society." {christy at stellarimpact dot org} Cmorrellstinson (talk) 00:53, 6 July 2012 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)