EMF2GO

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Temporal Buffer concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Temporal Buffer, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Temporal Buffer

Hello EMF2GO. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Temporal Buffer".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Temporal Buffer}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:21, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:45, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, EMF2GO. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
• instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 21:03, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

---

Thank you ScrapIronIV. I recently created a page for the Society for Benefit Cost Analysis, and disclosed my membership in the Society. As a member, I pay dues, but I do not receive any compensation nor any other material benefit. This is a professional academic society, not to my knowledge involved in any public controversy. I think my description of it was factual, verifiable, and neutral in tone. I understand we disagree about whether it is notable. What prompted me to create the page is that, during a web search, I landed on Wikipedia's "SBCA" disambiguation page. It listed four organizations -- none of them, in my view, nearly as notable as the Society. This struck me, and would strike anyone familiar with the Society, as a weakness in Wikipedia -- one that I sought to remedy. EMF2GO