EconExpert
Joined 1 August 2009
Latest comment: 15 years ago by EconExpert in topic August 2009
August 2009
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Paul Krugman, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. LK (talk) 15:29, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- I do not appreciate your change of the article away from my edits. Worst of all, you did not even list a reason for your change. My edits were all good, and detailed exactly the incidents in question. Currently, the article is not chronologically correct. It lists the Krugman quotes before his explanation, when in fact the Krugman quotes came after Krugman's clarification. Your change made the article substantially worse, got rid of key evidence, and I would appreciate an apology, and the page should be changed back to my edits. Thank you. EconExpert (talk) 16:04, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- I just learned that user LK identified my important edit, detailed on the talk page, as "vandalism". This is easily seen as incorrect. User LK should not be so brash. EconExpert (talk) 16:07, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Since you accuse me of being 'out of control', kindly explain how your important edit, "Hair of the Dog" [1], is not vandalism, and does not violate WP:BLP. LK (talk) 16:46, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- See talk page on krugman. Thanks. EconExpert (talk) 17:36, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- This is a BLP, stop your disruptive reverts. Scribner (talk) 01:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- You changed accepted content that was placed into the lead of the Krugman article by a Krugman supporter, no less. I had put the lead back in because you should not have removed it. Please see my comment in the Krugman's talk page. This is not consistent with current standards - see Walter Williams, Jeffrey Miron, Milton Friedman, and George Will - all have conservative in the lead. More wiki bias. EconExpert (talk) 03:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC)