Edapoe

Speedy deletion of Dollhouse murders

A tag has been placed on Dollhouse murders, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Unforgiven24 (talk) 18:18, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

July 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Roman Polanski, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Roman Polanski was changed by Edapoe (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947036 on 2012-07-27T11:12:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:12, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roman Polanski. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Vertium ^{When all is said} _{and done} 12:10, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Edapoe. You have new messages at Vertium's talk page.
Message added 01:45, 28 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I strongly encourage you to discontinue making posts that imply someone needs to be a child molester to edit your posts. I, for one, will not tolerate such behavior and you're advised that this is the only warning you'll receive from me. The next one will cause me to petition an admin to block you.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Roman Polanski with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 02:11, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Roman Polanski. Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 02:12, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Roman Polanski. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Calmer Waters 02:49, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

You have also been warned and reverted repeatedly for disruptively editing. The edit summary of No reason to change my post unless your a child molseter as well to Vertium was uncalled for and borderline blockable in itself as a personal attack. Calmer Waters 02:59, 28 July 2012 (UTC)