June 2023

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Scotty Le Edler, from its old location at User:Edman197/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - RichT|C|E-Mail 00:47, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scotty Le Edler (June 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- RichT|C|E-Mail 00:49, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Edman197! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - RichT|C|E-Mail 00:49, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Scotty Le Edler

edit

  Hello, Edman197. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scotty Le Edler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:05, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scotty Le Edler (December 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- RichT|C|E-Mail 23:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Edman197 (talk) 23:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I see that I was declined for not having footnotes. I have 16 footnotes listed with inline numbers in the text.

Could I get a little better explanation as to what is the issue with the citation problems. I am a professional academic (history and government professor) who is trained in Chicago Manual of Style/Turabian and APA. I feel as though I am following the citation method on other Wikipedia pages.