Archive 20Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27Archive 30

Vandalism on a certain page you created

DeWanda Wise page has an IP address and EdenaMatthews keep vandalizing my sources repeatedly. I even clarified that several times that my sources are reliable. Please User:Edwardx look in to it for good faith. She graduated from New York University's Tisch School of the Arts in 2006 (the fourth link is the source), NOT in 2012 and she was not born in 1990. In addition, her legal name is actually DeWanda Jackson and Dewanda Wise is her professional name. Same source as the fourth link.EdenaMatthews keep removing my reliable sources. None of the references said DeWanda Wise graduated in 2012 at NYU. A reliable source said she graduated in 2006 at NYU. People are using her character, Nola Darling from She's Gotta Have It (TV series) as her age (ex. 1990) to determine when she graduated at NYU and her birth year. In my reliable source, Wise already said she was not Nola Darling's age.Lbtocth (talk) 20:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. Have added DeWanda Jackson to the article, and will keep an eye on things. I do not see a source given for the date of birth - is there a reliable source for it? Edwardx (talk) 22:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

I just added the source. According to Reddit, it is a reliable source on birthdays of famous people. Just not popularity.Lbtocth (talk) 23:47, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Alas, the clear consensus is that famousbirthdays.com is NOT a reliable source for our purposes. Please see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_224#Why_famousbirthdays.com_is_a_reliable_source_for_birth_dates. Searching the archives at WP:RSN normally finds that a source has been discussed before. Edwardx (talk) 00:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

If that is the case, please remove her birthdate all together because there wasn't a single reliable source to verify her birthdate. I did not put May 30. I do not know who put it, but there weren't any sources next to it at all. I think it would be wise to leave her birthdate out of her page.Lbtocth (talk) 01:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

She never announced her birthdate anywhere. The only way to fully confirmed is that she confirmed directly or someone have access to her public record.Lbtocth (talk) 01:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Lbtocth and Edwardx. I've removed the famousbirthdays reference as unreliable. I've been looking for a reliable source and haven't found anything yet. https://www.facebook.com/pg/DeWandaWise/ looks like it may be her official Facebook page. There may be info there. --Ronz (talk) 02:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Ronz, Thank you for keeping us updated.Lbtocth (talk) 05:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
I have deleted her DOB. From the Baltimore Sun (and there is something similar in the LA Times), " Age: She doesn't share her age. "It’s because last year … I was on three shows. Claire is 20, Nola is 26, and Shameeka is 34. I am none of those ages, and you know, Hollywood likes to box you very quickly. And the longer I can go unboxed, the longer I can continue to do the kind of work I want to do," Wise, said. " Nonetheless, if it were to be reported in a reliable source, we could too - Wikipedia is not censored. Edwardx (talk) 10:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Very good catch. If she has been consistently keeping it private, then we should as well per WP:DOB. --Ronz (talk) 17:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

If anyone tried to put her birthdate WITHOUT a reliable source, I think we should remove it.Lbtocth (talk) 18:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 26

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018

  • #1Lib1Ref
  • User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
  • Bytes in brief

Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Swan with Two Necks, London

On 2 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Swan with Two Necks, London, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Swan with Two Necks was one of the principal departure points for coach travel to the north of England from London? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Swan with Two Necks, London. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Swan with Two Necks, London), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Russia Row for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Russia Row is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russia Row until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 07:54, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

Facto Post – Issue 9 – 5 February 2018

Facto Post – Issue 9 – 5 February 2018
 

m:Grants:Project/ScienceSource is the new ContentMine proposal: please take a look.

Wikidata as Hub

One way of looking at Wikidata relates it to the semantic web concept, around for about as long as Wikipedia, and realised in dozens of distributed Web institutions. It sees Wikidata as supplying central, encyclopedic coverage of linked structured data, and looks ahead to greater support for "federated queries" that draw together information from all parts of the emerging network of websites.

 

Another perspective might be likened to a photographic negative of that one: Wikidata as an already-functioning Web hub. Over half of its properties are identifiers on other websites. These are Wikidata's "external links", to use Wikipedia terminology: one type for the DOI of a publication, another for the VIAF page of an author, with thousands more such. Wikidata links out to sites that are not nominally part of the semantic web, effectively drawing them into a larger system. The crosswalk possibilities of the systematic construction of these links was covered in Issue 8.

Wikipedia:External links speaks of them as kept "minimal, meritable, and directly relevant to the article." Here Wikidata finds more of a function. On viaf.org one can type a VIAF author identifier into the search box, and find the author page. The Wikidata Resolver tool, these days including Open Street Map, Scholia etc., allows this kind of lookup. The hub tool by maxlath takes a major step further, allowing both lookup and crosswalk to be encoded in a single URL.


To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below.
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here.
Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM.

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

20:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi

Good morning I would like to ask for your help in editing the draft: Israel lucas Gois, the article is very good, could you help me put it on the air? I waited for return

André Luiz nogari (talk) 13:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Help

Good morning I would like to ask for your help in editing the draft: Israel lucas Gois, the article is very good, could you help me put it on the air? I waited for return

André Luiz nogari (talk) 13:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Edwardx, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!
 
 
The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
  • We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

  • We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
  • Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: January 2018

 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

21:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Yana Peel

Thanks for your help on this, particularly with overlinking - some useful changes that had missed my proofing! Have changed a tense back to present as it deals with current endeavours - I'd forgotten to add reason for the removal of the tags - I believe my edit dealt with the issues presented by them, hence removal. Happy to talk more about the article to improve it. Beckettnoti (talk) 16:45, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

I have copied your message to Talk:Yana Peel where it is more appropriate, and have replied there. Edwardx (talk) 18:05, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Here's some links from today, FYI.

Thanks. You're making me hungry. Time for a walk to Waitrose (other supermarkets do of course exist). Edwardx (talk) 18:06, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

22:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red

 
Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons.
 
 


Historically, our March event has been one of the biggest offerings of the year. This year, we are collaborating with two other wiki communities. Our article campaign is the official on-line/virtual node for Art+Feminism. Our image campaign supports the Whose Knowledge? initiative. Women's History Month 2018

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

Incomplete DYK nomination

  Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Warwick Castle, Maida Vale at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:27, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

19:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Innocent Victims

On 2 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Innocent Victims, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Innocent Victims (pictured) is a memorial sculpture to Diana, Princess of Wales, and Dodi Fayed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Innocent Victims. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Innocent Victims), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

About changing color on episodes section for a TV series

Hi Edwardx! Is there a rule about changing colors on episodes section such as the background and line color? Can someone change the colors of the background and line color for a TV series just because he or she wants to change it? I am asking you because you seemed to know about the most updated rules on Wikipedia.Lbtocth (talk) 02:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Laid to Rest: Exhumed

 

Hello, Edwardx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Laid to Rest: Exhumed".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Legacypac. Probably best to delete the draft, as the principal photography scheduled for December 2017 never happened. I have redirected Laid to Rest: Exhumed to our article about the original film. Edwardx (talk) 23:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

17:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Said Baaghil

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Said Baaghil, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 01:29, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Bethany Ashton Wolf for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bethany Ashton Wolf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bethany Ashton Wolf until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LADY LOTUSTALK 02:52, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Christian Boros has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Edwardx. Christian Boros, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 10 – 12 March 2018

Facto Post – Issue 10 – 12 March 2018
 

Milestone for mix'n'match

Around the time in February when Wikidata clicked past item Q50000000, another milestone was reached: the mix'n'match tool uploaded its 1000th dataset. Concisely defined by its author, Magnus Manske, it works "to match entries in external catalogs to Wikidata". The total number of entries is now well into eight figures, and more are constantly being added: a couple of new catalogs each day is normal.

Since the end of 2013, mix'n'match has gradually come to play a significant part in adding statements to Wikidata. Particularly in areas with the flavour of digital humanities, but datasets can of course be about practically anything. There is a catalog on skyscrapers, and two on spiders.

These days mix'n'match can be used in numerous modes, from the relaxed gamified click through a catalog looking for matches, with prompts, to the fantastically useful and often demanding search across all catalogs. I'll type that again: you can search 1000+ datasets from the simple box at the top right. The drop-down menu top left offers "creation candidates", Magnus's personal favourite. m:Mix'n'match/Manual for more.

For the Wikidatan, a key point is that these matches, however carried out, add statements to Wikidata if, and naturally only if, there is a Wikidata property associated with the catalog. For everyone, however, the hands-on experience of deciding of what is a good match is an education, in a scholarly area, biographical catalogs being particularly fraught. Underpinning recent rapid progress is an open infrastructure for scraping and uploading.

Congratulations to Magnus, our data Stakhanovite!

 
3D printing

To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below.
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here.
Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM.

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

A goat for you!

 

ive never sent anyone a goat before.

Stiger87 (talk) 14:32, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

The goat looks like an adult, so I can see you're not kidding (terrible joke). This is my first ever Wikipedia goat - thank you. Edwardx (talk) 14:48, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

19:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Anne Finucane draft

Hello, Edwardx. Not sure if you saw my message on the Anne Finucane talk page, but I wanted to reach out since you created the article to see if you'd be willing to review an expanded draft. I've built upon the information you included and have used secondary sourcing to add more details about her background and career. As I've written the new draft on behalf of Bank of America via their PR agency, I won't take it live myself and am hoping editors like yourself would like to review. You can view my full request here. Would you be interested in taking a look at the draft? Thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 19:00, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:F. Scott Frazier concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:F. Scott Frazier, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:In Fabric

 

Hello, Edwardx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "In Fabric".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — JJMC89(T·C) 20:03, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, JJMC89. Film looks to be happening, so have expanded it, and removed the tag. Edwardx (talk) 21:11, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

15:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions Notification

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

-- Nick (talk) 13:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC)